[Acme] [Errata Verified] RFC9115 (7336)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 11 January 2024 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7B7C14F6A5; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:40:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtPFC1stEAWf; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0FDC1C637B; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E51571A2161C; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:36:08 -0800 (PST)
To: cabo@tzi.org, yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com, antonio.pastorperales@telefonica.com, thomas.fossati@arm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, acme@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240111153608.E51571A2161C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 07:36:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/hzJ9Ehp6jWNvvr9RvVvXPgSfi_s>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 03:05:43 -0800
Subject: [Acme] [Errata Verified] RFC9115 (7336)
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:40:10 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC9115,
"An Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Profile for Generating Delegated Certificates". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7336

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Date Reported: 2023-02-06
Verified by: Roman Danyliw.com (IESG)

Section: Appendix A

Original Text
-------------
   oid = text .regexp "([0-2])((\.0)|(\.[1-9][0-9]*))*"


Corrected Text
--------------
   oid = text .regexp "([0-2])((\.0)|(\.[1-9][0-9]*))*"


Notes
-----
Backslashes need to be doubled in CDDL strings (as they are done in Appendix B).

An alternative fix would be to replace \. by [.]

Note that the equivalent fix is not required for

   regtext = text .regexp "([^\*].*)|([\*][^\*].*)|([\*][\*].+)"

as the fact that the single backslashes have no effect is irrelevant here — the backslashes are not needed in the character classes [...].
As an editorial enhancement, the backslashes could be entirely removed from this line.

--------------------------------------
RFC9115 (draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Profile for Generating Delegated Certificates
Publication Date    : September 2021
Author(s)           : Y. Sheffer, D. López, A. Pastor Perales, T. Fossati
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG