IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Call for adoption STAR (short-term automatically-renewed) certificates

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873FA127BA3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KZSpkhhCF8ud for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1819D1242F5 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE173004B7 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:56:34 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id UE3f9UiAGCgP for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host-6.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A8D13003FE; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:56:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <3A8069D0-9194-4773-A991-31DC70891912@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_275DE485-8765-447A-BA6F-9784E2ADC1F1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:56:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <38420507dd4a4d0ab1e82ff5a8c07a00@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <38420507dd4a4d0ab1e82ff5a8c07a00@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/mryd3nJsi3_seszQs8RkJP0L5KQ>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Call for adoption STAR (short-term automatically-renewed) certificates
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 19:56:36 -0000

After very quickly looking at the document, I am not clear which parts will make up the ACME extensions.  I need more clarity to offer an opinion.

Russ


> On Jun 8, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> At the June 2 interim, we had consensus to adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-acme-star/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-acme-star/> as a WG document, subject to splitting
> It into two documents, the ACME extension in one, and the delegation protocol in another.  This corresponds to #1 and #2 in the abstract of the draft.
>  
> The authors have agreed to do this.  Assuming that the split document is done, are there any objections to adopting *the ACME extensions* as a WG document?  Please respond by the end of next week.  We will have a separate discussion on the other protocol.
>  
> --  
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
> IM: richsalz@jabber.at <mailto:richsalz@jabber.at> Twitter: RichSalz
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email