Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 18 December 2014 20:04 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A3E1A86FB for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:04:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NU-fsKtSHFph for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512D21A1B94 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so5146148obc.1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SW6xikw4Cue2VhKqEYlBui9U91ytpQCUthNz9cTUClg=; b=qCupTr6T4ngGk6ybtZt7tEuL8FjbQcUBYrroHesfI7cnKXiVV7REdRKxFOKq59uQ6X QoxiFnGRU1exesOMSmVSSCodvzJ6c9CFotHfyIaqATbVOTE1qrKBLpO9J4B3k/Wg1f2O 0K2RAZ83gmgW5fqzJuL8Loq8uK29axfy0XE04WExPxOJhTIzavw9gfAAHZx4uQii456D Eo6m5VaB6VWvvvrZlSchIxn8HyzxCjWO9MpJaIbTFlTCs06VsypoHgvsPQNHfEZ2uOgd 0H8kFaklq/GN/NsRr/IMs7G2bxyDQIG/25xu4SmYvlYr04mDet7H722LkJee5wBv9L9z 8frg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.131.232 with SMTP id op8mr490157oeb.59.1418932986544; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.49.203 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <549331D7.7030302@gmail.com>
References: <5492C4AF.3050708@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWxuD4qPeaMEQZWacxZEO1nCh5XczsG+BvnE9hrZHPTiA@mail.gmail.com> <549331D7.7030302@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:03:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX-A6NVKASA9wEZ3e0n7aFjgg9x9rRTFL3tL9Cw6GN25Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/oGChTZs1mLUZc7QbH6H_XdZ8f2E
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:04:14 -0000
On 18 December 2014 at 11:58, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > The authorized key pair mentioned in the spec is *another* key-pair than > used for the CSR? > If not, the design appears strange to me at least. They are the same.
- [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys Anders Rundgren
- Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] "authorized key pair" vs CSR keys Anders Rundgren