Re: [Acme] Adopt two email-related drafts

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Russ,

On 08/06/2017 20:50, Russ Housley wrote:

>> At the interim, we had strong consensus to adopt Alexsey’s draft (was 
>> one, is now two) on ACME challenges and certs for email services and 
>> users:
>> _https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-melnikov-acme-email-smime/_
>
> Why is the email address limited to all ASCII?  The LAMPS WG is almost 
> done with the document for a certificate to include internationalized 
> email addresses in certificates, so I would like to see them included 
> here too.

I've done the quickest job I could do to get something published before 
the ACME Interim. As email addresses require new ACME identity type 
anyway, supporting Internationalized Emails should be relatively 
straightforward.
So yes, I am happy to do that.
>
>> _https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-melnikov-acme-email-tls/_
>
> I hope we are not depended in any way on AUTH=SCRAM-SHA-1.

There is no obvious dependency on SCRAM at this point. If you are 
talking about example EHLO response, it includes all sort of other 
capabilities that are not relevant. I am happy to clarify this in the 
document.

Best Regards,
Alexey