Re: [Acme] [EXTERNAL] Re: acme-device-attest expired

It's worth noting that Apple has already implemented this draft on macOS,
iOS, iPadOS, and tvOS[1]. We've implemented the server side at Smallstep
and can confirm that there is adoption. That shouldn't stop the evolution
of this draft, of course, but could help inform it. Adoption is promising
and it would be unfortunate to see this die at draft.

We don't have any experienced IETF authors here -- not sure what that
entails -- but we are very interested in the outcome here and would be
happy to help however we can. To start, I've shared this with a few
contacts that I know will also be interested.

Mike

[1] https://support.apple.com/lt-lt/guide/deployment/dep28afbde6a/web

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:21 PM Mike Ounsworth <Mike.Ounsworth=
40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> At the risk of adding another draft to my plate, I am the lead author on
> draft-ietf-lamps-csr-attestation, so I suppose it is reasonable for me to
> volunteer to work on this one also.
>
>
>
> I wonder if the design of acme-device-attest should change in light of the
> existence of draft-ietf-lamps-csr-attestation? But I admit to not having
> read acme-device-attest in a while :/
>
>
>
> ---
>
> *Mike* Ounsworth
>
>
>
> *From:* Acme <acme-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Prachi Jain
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2024 6:03 AM
> *To:* Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com>; acme@ietf.org;
> draft-acme-device-attest.authors@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Acme] acme-device-attest expired
>
>
>
> Thank you for the update, Deb. I am more than willing to work as an author
> on this draft and help out :) On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5: 28 AM Deb Cooley
> <debcooley1@ gmail. com> wrote: I know Brandon has been busy, but I don't
> know his plans
>
> Thank you for the update, Deb.
>
>
>
> I am more than willing to work as an author on this draft and help out :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:28 AM Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I know Brandon has been busy, but I don't know his plans for this draft.
> Maybe his use case has changed?  I've cc'd him on this message.
>
>
>
> Note:  acme is a 'working group', to get a draft through the process
> people have to be willing to work on the draft (vice merely following).
> Also drafts can certainly have multiple authors, perhaps an offer of
> helping as an author might work.
>
>
>
> Deb
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 11:01 AM Prachi Jain <prachi.jain1288@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been closely following this document as well and would like to know
> the status of the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Prachi
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 1:57 AM Thomas Fossati <tho.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> The acme-device-attest draft is expired.
>
> Just checking: what are the plans?
>
> cheers, thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!ZpiFHiNqjoIYpSwf-NWcpF4npfhv0fs0h1DfNQ82nrL17Uiy4d4RIWH4gGVLXQyjT68S1PkaY3m248MMkAE2Gdu_c1MH60I$>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!ZpiFHiNqjoIYpSwf-NWcpF4npfhv0fs0h1DfNQ82nrL17Uiy4d4RIWH4gGVLXQyjT68S1PkaY3m248MMkAE2Gdu_c1MH60I$>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>