Re: [Acme] Of revocation, time, and certificates

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 27 March 2024 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5973C15155B for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqBgZz0opQvq for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12048C15109A for <acme@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (60-240-91-174.static.tpgi.com.au [60.240.91.174]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80E31F448; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 05:03:27 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.b="Fv5IaPYX"; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31EBDA1914; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:03:23 +1100 (AEDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1711515803; bh=ZfwaSsUktQ1drxTiLAb6gcfUhH0z9GIi+ENRoPM0CpI=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=Fv5IaPYXzhavBgl1qxi97LUtQ/zbGdRcFI2PZ04YVP+Gh1Xi80u0dsZzEMm9wg0uf H56qFBNknDp4cfwId1B5XbdSxNTWaxQKNnHzF2yJMYZFVEiRDhwpJsAk7ORaP2fQjp hIHcgveEpvWoqrKf9bF9/xGx/80wuLtBEbrsSbky0b2Cw6fVsw1K/E5+qI2C7YrGgp t5pU0vUzkYZSLii94HN7VXEliYv1mCDJel0biASaYDWCUUA/UtWpRfSiVveAcxQ+L7 0fDqpIuCME3N9sBM1pA1/FvbM+xs6dUIvVV+uIeBJwUjPsQ2HbtzpuV6OCZdCyQKqR aMzMmOvdlIjsQ==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F922A190E; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:03:23 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "lamps@ietf.org" <lamps@ietf.org>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <56CA447A-3B68-4FCB-9CD8-925BADEB069B@akamai.com>
References: <56CA447A-3B68-4FCB-9CD8-925BADEB069B@akamai.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> message dated "Tue, 26 Mar 2024 16:24:59 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:03:23 +1100
Message-ID: <492104.1711515803@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/qIVzLR60lrJGLkv2iR0dLx9mNvY>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Of revocation, time, and certificates
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 05:03:34 -0000

Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > An amusing story about NTP failures, affecting PKI issuance, and
    > embedded devices.  Worth a read IMO
    > https://infosec.exchange/@bob_zim/111862834586135218  Cross-posted to
    > two active lists, please reply appropriately.

It is an interesting storey of multiple small failures adding up.
It makes me question ever having a notAfter other than 99991231 :-)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*