IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Acme] Short WGLC review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-13

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 10 December 2020 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE053A127C for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6Ym2nqfmNaB for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9513A12D1 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84AC300BC5 for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:45:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id soxOh3FIhTLD for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:45:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dynamic-005-005-033-020.5.5.pool.telefonica.de (unknown [204.194.23.17]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EF283005DB; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:45:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <97A824BC-CD7F-4D66-8701-9946A75F8AC4@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_20183336-DD1F-4C71-902E-054E4E6FAEA8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:45:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0C99CBF3-A8D3-4BB2-9A57-A9F946BED27D@akamai.com>
Cc: IETF ACME <acme@ietf.org>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <0C99CBF3-A8D3-4BB2-9A57-A9F946BED27D@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/s4F9V_GxLSt6dXiE2clYa7f1xQ8>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Short WGLC review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-13
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:45:09 -0000

This makes sense to me.

Russ

> On Dec 10, 2020, at 1:23 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> In order to address feedback that came up during AD and WGLC review, Alexey posted a new draft.
> This link will show the differences: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-13.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-13.txt>
>  
> Summary is that it adds text about putting the right keyUsage extensions (signing, encryption) so that different keys/certs can be used for signing and encryption. It’s important to be able to have separate signing and encryption keys.
>  
> Please send feedback by the end of next week.  Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email