Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 08 March 2017 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F686129665 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 05:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_oB_sXe72A3 for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 05:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ED6129655 for <acme@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 05:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AB7433406; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:00:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC6C4F09E; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:00:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1488978027; bh=Q9lg0b9LurEp8KfS3Fs5HqiIiDJ5Ex88jC7mdl/3n9g=; l=175; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gkoDw+K4cxM5AwYlie0Pw316izNbJ1yclEX8w47H7N4rp/1pD1VNmXEDxenAYcLfL 3gvOWB5SuTUo79rP+UO9bOW5+tyGmmbehzuYKCzV/5bJr1XbofQ+WgtKG8ndNKGjrZ nymtgLeK7Vdwt96EfplwOVlSpxCPkz+9mw6+YbO0=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487551FC88; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:00:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:00:26 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:00:26 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Logan Widick <logan.widick@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges
Thread-Index: AQHSl5PlV1KnxZ8WyUGUN/+numVw96GKpNwAgABD0MA=
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:00:26 +0000
Message-ID: <73bf64eceade46f896da9ad077ccc0bf@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAMmAzE+yqFXWVcgHmBGaGR21sx0a0-VUBogoFLxFcrvoFrwkYw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV5T-eXmb3b+e67tVqBZSDH6=Zrg2fbENh-ggQA5oU3wQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV5T-eXmb3b+e67tVqBZSDH6=Zrg2fbENh-ggQA5oU3wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.40.230]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/svYVChRxq0Sv2U-miw5TetvC0js>
Cc: "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:00:34 -0000
> I would rather see new challenges defined with a new hash function than > introduce orthogonal hash negotiation. Speaking as an individual, I strongly agree with this.
- [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges Logan Widick
- Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges Martin Thomson
- Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges Salz, Rich
- Re: [Acme] Hash algorithms for challenges Richard Barnes