Re: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 03 December 2015 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: acme@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5621ACD2F for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:08:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9rWjhSQGt9T for <acme@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB97F1ACD2E for <acme@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:08:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762C8496C09; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:08:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60874496C14; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:08:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1449176902; bh=udwHYANvC1IMxAVIWk9tCuoNCSLnvm8Sp+0zm3Brdmw=; l=227; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jhQGyR+hMhSo3OZ+Bqb6DBS3mH7RTb2/50AaBCYznU6ivTgwCyT6x5JurwgGByldJ 21A3fXlUFZaJ9PvT26smD074bTXXPbDr5IBX0lQuWntH58+rbohWCHsur/52YbfHkp DUK0UtAYs/3TwOTuL2C8zKKP3Ar2WZ3clSyB0JQQ=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas2.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447981E08A; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:08:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:08:21 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:08:21 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Jonas Wielicki <jonas@wielicki.name>, "acme@ietf.org" <acme@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers
Thread-Index: AQHRK5MBunc3Wjl4WkiBqydd1Vbnup61rhwAgARo2oD//68TwA==
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:08:20 +0000
Message-ID: <54cf32ea17f84c45819733ef9340a666@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <565C84A1.9040102@wielicki.name> <20151201013638.GA29577@andover> <5660AC99.3020506@wielicki.name>
In-Reply-To: <5660AC99.3020506@wielicki.name>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.41.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/acme/umN1OgO7iKzEE3JpAq9ianMPXEU>
Subject: Re: [Acme] Support for domains with redundant but not immediately synchronized servers
X-BeenThere: acme@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automated Certificate Management Environment <acme.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/>
List-Post: <mailto:acme@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>, <mailto:acme-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 21:08:24 -0000

> Should I open an issue on the protocol draft repository? (Which I assume is at [1])
>   [1]: https://github.com/letsencrypt/acme-spec


No!  Please use the IETF WG repo, at https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/issues