Re: [Add] questions about the Examples section of svcb-dns-02

David <opendak@shaw.ca> Thu, 08 April 2021 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <opendak@shaw.ca>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90623A0CB2 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shaw.ca header.b=rWja8wt/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shaw.ca header.b=rWja8wt/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIPsZ6nKHlGz for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CFE53A0CB1 for <add@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.51] ([70.77.9.105]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id UX5elrB0KHmS3UX5flKjlJ; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:01:07 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1617897667; bh=GlYKA1adI4y2zjOX4hUyO6sV6JqzqpizmFjGG+SBWzU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rWja8wt/vTAfNf3RT21FX25c2Tr7ojQzM/0S7JBQMwyyavPpQU7p1N1b9BjfHACyb A+1kdCyK+PwVc9qJboLObHlt/kTWVIASU0J/A4NhURY/8AJ4FPRh9bP/FqwwneVv9G GaX+yu4KkYtHPwk/XPcyWFKf6lNGXoD9+bF1dfhOVgnN4aY7XN82K66LvHe8aA4Vw5 AszwAU3PaH4y9fmt5OJGmvmaXLR19UevbdIu/5dwuwq2GNijYKhGzBm5BE6ynk374G v00WqatX5dGk084WrjVK8Vf92lGarSVu2BnMGwBVShwXyLasb6jClBPM6zbWaJyd2S EnazkCkA45DQA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1617897667; bh=GlYKA1adI4y2zjOX4hUyO6sV6JqzqpizmFjGG+SBWzU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rWja8wt/vTAfNf3RT21FX25c2Tr7ojQzM/0S7JBQMwyyavPpQU7p1N1b9BjfHACyb A+1kdCyK+PwVc9qJboLObHlt/kTWVIASU0J/A4NhURY/8AJ4FPRh9bP/FqwwneVv9G GaX+yu4KkYtHPwk/XPcyWFKf6lNGXoD9+bF1dfhOVgnN4aY7XN82K66LvHe8aA4Vw5 AszwAU3PaH4y9fmt5OJGmvmaXLR19UevbdIu/5dwuwq2GNijYKhGzBm5BE6ynk374G v00WqatX5dGk084WrjVK8Vf92lGarSVu2BnMGwBVShwXyLasb6jClBPM6zbWaJyd2S EnazkCkA45DQA==
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MaypB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=606f28c3 a=VsD8yxyCjIJu8ocd7IiwMw==:117 a=VsD8yxyCjIJu8ocd7IiwMw==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=wh6levz1AAAA:20 a=mz4-4ytoo9JorxlM51UA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Cc: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
References: <4613b8d0773d1ae5f806347bbce909fa74439886.camel@powerdns.com> <CAHbrMsCM3pwu7zYVhVzCMKB37_gSMyb6KY3je3NVYQBAwt6kNg@mail.gmail.com> <dc371c7284d3c05d07cf0a550b37f9a624d968c9.camel@powerdns.com> <ba952ca3-b6fe-be9a-8829-a926cb32e148@shaw.ca> <CAHbrMsAN0PkC-yUdWR6HhkrX-JJ3cCwvgGBJRD2EXLYRjbQVEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David <opendak@shaw.ca>
Message-ID: <17de2348-178b-93ca-7fa9-248a9a426ca4@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 10:01:06 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsAN0PkC-yUdWR6HhkrX-JJ3cCwvgGBJRD2EXLYRjbQVEw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfEjRcZh6ckzBlerrKc0HlGtllu/oatZHtnU2d4LTr/qrGJdQALiJyTNmF4X9iKmvQKUIfrUAujhzwdEvAVTrxKU8dCxtJ2I9m4NpHoNOn/xgONrPa3vg hYn7UYLumM9FAFoTPUYPuLwltsMNeIGFK4oZGj/1Q9hyWga6BzBKw6mABqUm4kxnDj3egdZnS1Jn5g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/23XzL8uVzTMEiymxdUGnGnUp574>
Subject: Re: [Add] questions about the Examples section of svcb-dns-02
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 16:01:11 -0000

On 2021-04-08 9:05 a.m., Ben Schwartz wrote:
> OK, I've clarified (and corrected, oops) the explanation of the examples,
> and added another one to highlight the default-DoT behavior:
> https://github.com/bemasc/svcb-dns/commit/e59c995fa976a19b5baf1770afb231d3dcb729e1
> 

I think this definitely helps. Would you be opposed to one more example 
of a DoH-only endpoint? I think that would be a common use case and 
having the DoT+DoH vs DoH-only examples would provide extra enforcement 
of there being a default.

> We can certainly remove the default ALPN, but personally I like having
> empty SvcParams correspond to a common default.  The size savings (~8
> bytes) are probably not important, although MTU could become relevant in
> the context of SVCB delegation responses as envisioned
> by draft-rescorla-dprive-adox.
>