Re: [Add] DNS visibility, malware C&C, exfiltration, etc.

Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Wed, 29 May 2019 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ritter.vg>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2747A1201DB for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ritter.vg
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sd5YM_GS6chd for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBA0120096 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id f8so2743961wrt.1 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DYlKivuhJ7tNrbGGehg1megiogbWk58xd0PX2evrG3k=; b=xbDNGcKWVPNuMzqhSHESYCskPM1JVo5fotc8KJNYE0W3rdWXULoxoJLKiXvF42CDSz qtxhvVFipn8AquxwuO1NKVB3WshhfosU+r3vrU5/6TAsKOpNa2ENtOmpwr1NToeCPDaZ CAvYv0Y8U9sDVN3tTf5veDJSpFMpnKyiybblM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DYlKivuhJ7tNrbGGehg1megiogbWk58xd0PX2evrG3k=; b=hRPim7oTcx3ChtVldfQADbBSAcqGeYFfZvMEAOk04TfDbZCyKqHoNreQrbQJ1VQn9t nFm/5GcTQ7snK3Ro04zaWV8GRTK8IK2thDABcg2XA3zoEc1579TtSSpB0nWGq3XDKhYb mZIDlWp6dmNOhRLOVU1aF3AQiTsjAwN6/N3hcbBHv18jSAbYwdo3LJows33l60/vEOnf l4gyXwSENksGABeZQ/Ar8j+bkE7iMiZ2P5YDzpbEM28DOewl/UnjinzusIq8LQ1N14R4 iRB/gCxdSeOk8Nts31zdHRXQssUbWnA/bQ3fRsFWNwt90BHJmueFWFT/pedy45i0ksON +dOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVPUxPMOpXpdLYut4IVd877dSyj5tm2ydEKcxuseEv6lb6t3Tzi BuuhRS2EYzIOEazCi3NgTDzIGlWTPxmbDmZ+Piq+pem8sXU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzV70cgR9SQF5O4CSKYraz41D4aEXUcpTLtickLnmVo2eCKwxXrr1EddRtXUQDUjJCxSjqzcAYijMZpad9tMvc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5283:: with SMTP id c3mr57886wrv.268.1559163794306; Wed, 29 May 2019 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH1iCiqScUQQ00G+9a8UxU30pmFGPvy0W=EMsbx98dtdYWCSKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCiqScUQQ00G+9a8UxU30pmFGPvy0W=EMsbx98dtdYWCSKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:03:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+cU71=Jn8N+HstMeuQ4kQ4VYC9z6vzVF15Xv8TnqTN+tupb0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Cc: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/FmMqnAH8hzMZsS29uMjOzfW8mr0>
Subject: Re: [Add] DNS visibility, malware C&C, exfiltration, etc.
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:03:18 -0000

On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 20:43, Brian Dickson
<brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> admin-only enabling of DoH/DoT (which can be a policy pushed to managed systems)
> a hardcoded TRR list for DoH/DoT

Sure; I think these are perfectly reasonable enterprise policies to support.

Ex: https://github.com/mozilla/policy-templates/blob/master/README.md#dnsoverhttps


-tom