Re: [Add] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9463 (7804)

[[e-mail]]

Hi all, 

The erratum should be accepted. 

Thanks David for reporting this.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 février 2024 02:33
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Objet : [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9463 (7804)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9463, "DHCP and
> Router Advertisement Options for the Discovery of Network-designated
> Resolvers (DNR)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> rfc-
> editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7804&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orang
> e.com%7C55a93680af6448e3ab9908dc290f16ed%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6
> f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638430391984719495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4
> wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&s
> data=7YS07%2FFjPKPRXbQyb3By741unVY1%2BLnlMibNyJFtOOM%3D&reserved=0
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: David Härdeman <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 6.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", and "Service
> Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not present if the ADN-only mode is
> used (Section 3.1.6).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", "SvcParams Length",
> and "Service Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not present if the
> ADN-only mode is used (Section 3.1.6).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The paragraph is presumably copied from section 4.1 (DHCPv6 Encrypted
> DNS Option), and omits the "SvcParams Length" field, which is only
> present in the IPv6 RA Encrypted DNS Option. Mandating the presence of
> a superfluous length field when using the ADN-only mode seems like an
> oversight.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When
> a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the
> status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9463 (draft-ietf-add-dnr-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DHCP and Router Advertisement Options for the
> Discovery of Network-designated Resolvers (DNR)
> Publication Date    : November 2023
> Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., T. Reddy.K, Ed., D. Wing, N.
> Cook, T. Jensen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Adaptive DNS Discovery
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.