IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Add] [IANA #1361418] [Errata Verified] RFC9463 (7804)

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix-comment@iana.org> Tue, 23 April 2024 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA6BC18DB9F for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87KdPcM-2j1V for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215F5C180B5B for <add@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E558E158E; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:51:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7EBD04E346; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:51:29 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-matrix-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-matrix-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <20240317233958.A8AF23BA98@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1361418@icann.org> <20240317233958.A8AF23BA98@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-248307-1713840689-1814.1361418-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1361418
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: tojens@microsoft.com, neil.cook@noware.co.uk, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, kondtir@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, dwing-ietf@fuggles.com, david@hardeman.nu, add@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:51:29 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/O4wLgQeIkXlXT2J4v1SxV40dUPU>
Subject: [Add] [IANA #1361418] [Errata Verified] RFC9463 (7804)
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:51:34 -0000

Hi all,

Should this errata report be listed as an additional reference for the Encrypted DNS Option registration in the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Option Formats registry? See

https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters

thanks,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Sun Mar 17 23:40:59 2024, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC9463,
>  "DHCP and Router Advertisement Options for the Discovery of Network-
> designated Resolvers (DNR)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7804
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Technical
> 
> Reported by: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
> Date Reported: 2024-02-09
> Verified by: Eric Vyncke (IESG)
> 
> Section: 6.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", and "Service
> Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not present if the ADN-only mode
> is used (Section 3.1.6).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Note that the "Addr Length", "ipv6-address(es)", "SvcParams
> Length", and "Service Parameters (SvcParams)" fields are not
> present if the ADN-only mode is used (Section 3.1.6).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The paragraph is presumably copied from section 4.1 (DHCPv6 Encrypted
> DNS Option), and omits the "SvcParams Length" field, which is only
> present in the IPv6 RA Encrypted DNS Option. Mandating the presence of
> a superfluous length field when using the ADN-only mode seems like an
> oversight.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9463 (draft-ietf-add-dnr-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : DHCP and Router Advertisement Options for the
> Discovery of Network-designated Resolvers (DNR)
> Publication Date    : November 2023
> Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., T. Reddy.K, Ed., D. Wing, N.
> Cook, T. Jensen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Adaptive DNS Discovery
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email