Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Wed, 15 January 2020 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D63120241 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:13:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6XTwSExXm13t for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:13:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88E912083B for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:13:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PFE112-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.west.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with ESMTPS id 00FFDBv9011094 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:13:12 GMT
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:13:10 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.000; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:13:10 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] [Add] Updated charter proposal for ADD
Thread-Index: AQHVyytcQlPGU7pViE+lwCrvXwWZoKfsXFyA
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:13:09 +0000
Message-ID: <AD6E599F-96E8-44FC-8A05-8BFD2F659129@icann.org>
References: <236B0A34-8C7F-49D2-8075-5AF5AC35BDFB@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <236B0A34-8C7F-49D2-8075-5AF5AC35BDFB@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4CD2FC02-E3E6-4723-9493-EC795FE19441"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-01-15_02:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/ewMkg7Y4Ivr_QP3RzAqbRGwqeHg>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:13:26 -0000

The following paragraph in the proposed charter is impossible to meet for the vast majority of use cases that have been discussed on this list:

Any mechanisms that specify interactions between clients and
servers must provide the security properties expected of IETF
protocols, e.g., confidentiality protection, integrity protection,
and authentication with strong work factor.

Any mechanism whose understanding of the network and network services comes from interactions that were not cryptographically authenticated (such as DHCP and RA) cannot meet those requirements.

The presence of that paragraph will basically stop work being done in the WG once it is chartered. Please strongly consider removing it. Without that paragraph, the charter seems fine.

--Paul Hoffman