IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD

"Martin Thomson" <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 15 January 2020 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A586120639 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:52:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=foWTvlmg; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=xYiT16nM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lx-KjDKVpMMC for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553AF12010C for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1152C513 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:52:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:52:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=QIUSHKhzRtV5RYMyYfpUmyPf350vvq/ rE0oCwAByVq0=; b=foWTvlmgb6qC3ZvgYwiMoZY629KtzmD4uKE3bjyQByPzwV5 hw04tIeo62y7kgx3bSzERP1U0C23Q5APhcvoh1vEvx/ectNItSIqkZIw8HBheFPC aU/m8iqNjY17HuM/ct8O257tDUoCQpyzHU7PaL6dKeB03w1aRpvmReV/pEa0vOQH l/GbDglIifAxckOxBwHHJKhDkJMNPwK1ZCjcaVIsF0vLTv6nwSSCeNuHNy4IedSc +24hAsDyLlCbfVbYtUqzKCrzOp6o1R65YlrEXKDH5XTwR2jNA4IkVGBVTY2Phc6f qV2arjUa148F+Sh2CnzxGtFsVMVJrqLRgOG03AQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=QIUSHK hzRtV5RYMyYfpUmyPf350vvq/rE0oCwAByVq0=; b=xYiT16nMJKpAPV2vpMCG+E atbEWcOscORYeLyzfNwZqSnvH43UC8g+7L2gCwUJUfD77Ji9uBPJn28f23cK0aF9 vFjQSumGuz03QlDm/0jQ1Uk7uzJQxNlPzedfPZRM38a1R7AoDfrwBf0QW+z0cq+K 4nBRZPabo0LutmxoE5J2sHNAYaiIUYXJwaZZvKbtrmQGXmM3dUUT6tcfCSMaOASr kFLRtqSwLX+cxv/JiS+dLFwH1xxI41UXaYrZfOdhbSECBofJLNOig/uZd0OuqUen lBcjeHTup7tM/LQ4OgHF4lVDqLcUXICJu4ZL8X7gS/EjZcrHhYQd7hJskcCDdZtA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:wZcfXpSAYypluxYCBXGG6afSJm6yghCb1XUvKsYy0nIaEfGu7igVmA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrtdeggddtudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofi gvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:wZcfXtbm0tMwTnDb0Bz0z5LGkuAqcNgivYzx0ilig6B3zh_N9pKwXg> <xmx:wZcfXk1DGh84o1JqLIRKWnvik7GWjpZks074gQnpEsqWELj_A4sJEQ> <xmx:wZcfXgrSqHA2DtHtrLaPmovFzmNacFxeglGUTOwQ0xz1aIhbUSMoNA> <xmx:wZcfXg0J_ArYJTiUAEpHXOxh5jDv3_plAI9dxw7BUkm0fqWgSOEidQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7925DE00A5; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:52:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-754-g09d1619-fmstable-20200113v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <24b8e2da-cfbd-4c77-aeaa-6c57b0f29162@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AD6E599F-96E8-44FC-8A05-8BFD2F659129@icann.org>
References: <236B0A34-8C7F-49D2-8075-5AF5AC35BDFB@apple.com> <AD6E599F-96E8-44FC-8A05-8BFD2F659129@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:52:29 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: add@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/xkjIQ02jsmCyoOFSvPAYh2gsXqY>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Updated charter proposal for ADD
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:52:52 -0000

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 02:13, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> The following paragraph in the proposed charter is impossible to meet 
> for the vast majority of use cases that have been discussed on this 
> list:
> 
> Any mechanisms that specify interactions between clients and
> servers must provide the security properties expected of IETF
> protocols, e.g., confidentiality protection, integrity protection,
> and authentication with strong work factor.

Would it be better if the charter said that the work products must include mechanisms that provide or allow for <listed properties>, but that mechanisms might only provide opportunistic security [cite RFC].

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email