Re: [addr-select-dt] updating "draft-chown-addr-select-considerations-02.txt"

Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com> Tue, 19 May 2009 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <hiromi@inetcore.com>
X-Original-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAB93A6842 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.029
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, HOST_EQ_NE_JP=2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Qf8QT2Tsk22 for <addr-select-dt@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inc.inetcore.com (p0245a2.tokyff01.ap.so-net.ne.jp [121.2.69.162]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE473A6809 for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2403:2000:1:2:21b:63ff:fec9:f412] (unknown [IPv6:2403:2000:1:2:21b:63ff:fec9:f412]) by inc.inetcore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DC302CB81E for <addr-select-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2009 12:22:40 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <366F2511-16FB-470F-9111-0FBDE8FF849E@inetcore.com>
From: Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>
To: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <048AD578-53C4-433D-95F5-84C5D9C388F8@inetcore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:22:40 +0900
References: <048AD578-53C4-433D-95F5-84C5D9C388F8@inetcore.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: Re: [addr-select-dt] updating "draft-chown-addr-select-considerations-02.txt"
X-BeenThere: addr-select-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPv6 Address Selection Design Team <addr-select-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/addr-select-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:addr-select-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt>, <mailto:addr-select-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:21:37 -0000

Hello again,

Don't forget to refer this...

Problems with IPv6 source address selection and IPv4 NATs,
draft-denis-v6ops-nat-addrsel-00, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-denis-v6ops-nat-addrsel-00.txt

On 2009/05/18, at 21:43, Ruri Hiromi wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just looked over the minute of the last IETF.
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/6man/minutes
>
> From that minutes, we should pick 2 comments,
> - from Dave Thaler, to clarify that the node-wide problem is  
> destination address selection
> - from Thomas Narten, changes that utilize existing update  
> infrastructure,but changes to the update infrastructure. And our  
> answer is the former, is that right?
>
> From my observation, the consideration draft is not being working  
> group document. Is it enough for consideration adding above 2 points  
> to make it WG document?
> Don't we forget some other points?
>
> Regards,
> -------------------------------
> Ruri Hiromi
> Intec NetCore, Inc. / Keio university
> hiromi@inetcore.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> addr-select-dt mailing list
> addr-select-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/addr-select-dt

-------------------------------
Ruri Hiromi
Intec NetCore, Inc. / Keio university
hiromi@inetcore.com