[Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1788)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 25 May 2009 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: adslmib@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499B13A6D42 for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.263
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.263 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4zEUkuqesQb for <adslmib@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690FB3A6D0D for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4P4cfgC007863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n4P4ceni007862; Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:40 -0700
Message-Id: <200905250438.n4P4ceni007862@boreas.isi.edu>
To: rray@pesa.com, Rajesh.Abbi@alcatel.com, dromasca@avaya.com, rbonica@juniper.net, sneedmike@hotmail.com, Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: adslmib@ietf.org, smadar_t@rad.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Adslmib] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3728 (1788)
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/adslmib>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 04:37:57 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3728,
"Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3728&eid=1788

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Smadar Tauber <smadar_t@rad.com>

Section: Global

Original Text
-------------
Example:
   vdslPhysCurrSnrMgn OBJECT-TYPE
       SYNTAX       Integer32 (-127..127)
       UNITS        "0.25dBm"
       MAX-ACCESS   read-only
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
           "Noise Margin as seen by this Vtu with respect to its
           received signal in 0.25dB.  The effective range is
           -31.75 to +31.75 dB."
       REFERENCE    "T1E1.4/2000-009R3, Part 1, common spec"
        ::= { vdslPhysEntry 5 }

   vdslPhysCurrAtn OBJECT-TYPE
       SYNTAX       Gauge32 (0..255)
       UNITS        "0.25dBm"
       MAX-ACCESS   read-only
       STATUS       current
       DESCRIPTION
           "Measured difference in the total power transmitted by
           the peer Vtu and the total power received by this Vtu.
           The effective range is 0 to +63.75 dB."



Corrected Text
--------------
UNITS statement (dBm) does not match units appearing in DESCRIPTION text (dB).

I think 'dB' are the right units for the objects above, but one can check that. Anyway, it is clear that there should not be the existing mismatch.

Same problem for more MIB objects in the RFC.


  



Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3728 (draft-ietf-adslmib-vdsl-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Lines (VDSL)
Publication Date    : February 2004
Author(s)           : B. Ray, R. Abbi
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : ADSL MIB
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG