RE: [Adslmib] Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore wi th the VDSL MIB)

"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> Mon, 24 November 2003 16:46 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA15356 for <adslmib-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AOJqd-0006vR-VN for adslmib-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:06 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hAOGk3wH026618 for adslmib-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AOJqd-0006vF-QV for adslmib-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA15346 for <adslmib-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:45:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AOJqc-00006k-00 for adslmib-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:02 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AOJqc-00006h-00 for adslmib-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AOJqb-0006v0-45; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:46:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AOJq3-0006uE-Nt for adslmib@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:45:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA15328 for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:45:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AOJq2-00006V-00 for adslmib@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:45:26 -0500
Received: from auemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.223.161] helo=auemail1.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AOJq1-00005m-00 for adslmib@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:45:25 -0500
Received: from nl0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-85-76-62.lucent.com [135.85.76.62]) by auemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id hAOGiog17921 for <adslmib@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:44:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: by nl0006exch001h.nl.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <XRFGD167>; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:25:40 +0100
Message-ID: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15502FB8828@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: rray@pesa.com, Mike Sneed <sneedmike@hotmail.com>
Cc: adslmib mail list <adslmib@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Adslmib] Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and therefore wi th the VDSL MIB)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:25:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: adslmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: adslmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: adslmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: ADSLMIB <adslmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:adslmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib>, <mailto:adslmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Thanks, I will pick it up from there when I see it appear
in the repository.

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Ray [mailto:rray@pesa.com]
> Sent: maandag 24 november 2003 16:30
> To: Mike Sneed
> Cc: adslmib mail list
> Subject: Re: [Adslmib] Issue with HCTC Perf Interval MIB (and 
> therefore
> with the VDSL MIB)
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 11:06, Michael Sneed wrote:
> > During the IETF Last Call process there were some concerns 
> expressed in the 
> > IESG about the HCTC Performance Interval MIB 
> > (draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-06.txt) that we have recommended 
> to go to Proposed 
> > Standard.  In a nutshell, the problem is one of alignment 
> of the various 
> > MIBs that deal with this topic (namely RFC3593 and 2856).
> > 
> > As a result of this discussion, it has been recommended 
> that we change
> > 
> >     - HCPerfTimeElapsed, Gauge32 (0...86399)
> >     - HCPerfValidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
> >     - HCPerfInvalidIntervals, Gauge32 (0...96)
> > 
> > to type Integer32.
> 
> draft-ietf-adslmib-hc-tc-07.txt has been submitted with the above
> changes.
> 
> -- 
> Bob Ray <rray@pesa.com>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adslmib mailing list
> Adslmib@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib
> 

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
Adslmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib