[Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a minimal preservation requirement
Nancy Sahu <nancysahu@kriyanative.com> Mon, 31 August 2026 06:34 UTC
Return-Path: <nancysahu@kriyanative.com>
X-Original-To: agentproto@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: agentproto@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310B213208D59 for <agentproto@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1788158086; bh=0gCrBNoJURFf7TN+l/YxxamPcJs30McU+aztpiTWGLI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=jEMf7EZjaBCEEZV/Mm9Bow4Mx+JfjcRjzH2swcXJTZyzotZgU9Z9I0k/NTtiwFOaS tGHsibqG5rMloQslNoGZW4s/ECGdoMQBdl+/cVKGcVQ/TTQk+eO7u9M6lJrY5FsiY1 l36FFmYwX8t+3EPYXNjbRJtIaGPZXMWyKYeLJndw=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secureserver.net header.b="tD8Hq3BY"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kriyanative.com header.b="gj9G4Z7c"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7u_RSX_dy-q for <agentproto@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sxplsmtpa04-09.prod.sxb1.secureserver.net (sxplsmtpa04-09.prod.sxb1.secureserver.net [188.121.53.92]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A8D13208D54 for <agentproto@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa ([49.207.231.20]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 0vb7xnJEkauLE0vbBx0IEO; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 06:34:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureserver.net; s=secureserver2; t=1788158072; bh=0gCrBNoJURFf7TN+l/YxxamPcJs30McU+aztpiTWGLI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=tD8Hq3BYwWCCQFAmhQx8LjV2YdfRIxnCjvKzYgmIMFFEiNOikGsg1C2l4Tm87pMW/ lcURv3Clj5viJmzYE2Lg+XsSgN0qUNGwr4fqQDXm2NLy6olczdxRT3d3zhx/sfGUY2 ak9OOldIBaP2MnLoRdtz/vw4pvkXYd1i1HP/6xtJ4YRZ9ykPTs9ZyJTgvFA0Gk0P6T xTM6XSHcmpF2VQ7EhZnqCVBh37/C3UrSGUzaMf9ZAqCUc8+zMo/bAmPfyEwwOpxYvq 6A0oFbGnX1IRMLhqxP2Ux9zjB7W8zQc1IUqsZJQlhW0at5N/v1W5hS+E712QJKNTVE 2+VXjvgnrsHSg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kriyanative.com; s=secureserver1; t=1788158072; bh=0gCrBNoJURFf7TN+l/YxxamPcJs30McU+aztpiTWGLI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=gj9G4Z7cLTy9zYFEBXgtYyuHA3w2p3gSxzM7twHbP9mgTkudv4lgvywPF//+pBK0g Cg6SollFV3TOMgy13f8+i0lJtbmCHB3i1R6zlWgCQ3y3Et/+70BVYOnyxvXy3fBdQA pXXprnrIbP4vlLHjvhqL3BTQ5XSltSOeV9qyoAY4N0ihQZ+iAGAvU3LZ+0AfXwp3JX AiAoerVMAORxHH7D94NhoPt4UR9zlyEoplsH3T+WS4Yirr3625wEBY1HIpqPYfkYRR T9ZX3vCUmsXTqkn5H2ZiyZJXBMf3QJexLgRC/clRna9ThAaxxs6gZyZRKZjwzbxFTN jA4EONyey5dsg==
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=avwL4SZV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6a952077 a=U05Lq6pCvLdiu66SglX7RQ==:117 a=U05Lq6pCvLdiu66SglX7RQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=yTN9gEbPQBgfWEWgs0gA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Feedback-ID: 0c382ed7c7cbcf553ccd533a0b4c6b00:kriyanative.com:ssnet
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: nancysahu@kriyanative.com
From: Nancy Sahu <nancysahu@kriyanative.com>
To: agentproto@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:04:24 +0530
Message-ID: <178815806497.92417.4119928643128779643@kriyanative.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a051e72caf.404f622f1513069.375819837512848521@phionyx.ai>
References: <178807705986.19495.5674865162794398662@kriyanative.com> <1a051e72caf.404f622f1513069.375819837512848521@phionyx.ai>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMOXGLaqGFmQ2W0r0vFreL1/ats74ljKNrl/wTGkoSbAImZbqKqeDvQsFx3J0qstFwRjCZWOvphHR/akjlUIAZg0e5JK9H/7RkQM4EelWH8RrPLc9yu9 Ip07guIgvHKGwdTgyco8Lx29sVhFdivvUc86IB1d7S9uxxF/bpmqZWrLPvr2+QqAZ4QsiTlCtVKPbZYRs/0ii1df8IdUcUOy+44ODfir7DkWkxbmQtZN5Kcr CHlmpq5dZjcljhqzDVWndlXVKEDsPPGqmMNMUnDpfPteIoZNbUzG8BCyVj0q7YDpa882v9acNdiEJ38M7EW0BA==
Message-ID-Hash: XCQXFDFS5MGEQ7ZACCK7KF7ZNE4QP2X7
X-Message-ID-Hash: XCQXFDFS5MGEQ7ZACCK7KF7ZNE4QP2X7
X-MailFrom: nancysahu@kriyanative.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: founder@phionyx.ai
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a minimal preservation requirement
List-Id: Agent Communication Protocols <agentproto.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/agentproto/wW8KwE5Mju1L8acEBhdd_L0cJlQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/agentproto>
List-Help: <mailto:agentproto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:agentproto-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:agentproto@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:agentproto-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:agentproto-leave@ietf.org>
Ali - short answers. Wording: yes. Placement: yes, and it is the better placement. Your bullet is under Use Cases, Gap Analysis and Requirements, not under the framework deliverable, so it does not depend on the framework evidence line surviving the scope thread. Duplicate of the sentences Nicholas posted: no. Yours says which facts a protocol may not throw away when an operation crosses a boundary. Theirs says that whatever evidence the framework specifies must state its own limits. If one is dropped the other still stands. Test cases: yes, please send them. For the requirements work though, not for the charter decision - the bullet should be accepted or rejected on its own words. Nancy Sahu kriya native
- [Agentproto] Implementation evidence for a minima… Ali Toygar Abak
- [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a mi… Nancy Sahu
- [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a mi… Ali Toygar Abak
- [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a mi… Nancy Sahu
- [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a mi… Sumit Ahuja
- [Agentproto] Re: Implementation evidence for a mi… Ali Toygar Abak