[ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" and "AI User Input" categories
Adam and Joanne Gallagher <inspiredtaste@gmail.com> Sat, 01 August 2026 22:06 UTC
Return-Path: <inspiredtaste@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ai-control@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ai-control@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC89122312DF for <ai-control@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1785621986; bh=VZInS54tsTo9bQIuQUJWH79GjOguSlptbce84ZyJXK8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc; b=hvBpqCCxtti8+sLFZ/NPXx+q1nca4jMZbrk+2FF/lMUud3AnaSAANRu5hpUVOvKe1 2oPWGXAvd0qM5u0BUKM6MHJ32jE1K80Vm5I5x4EVcbli04qPii6MDRFalfuiaef79g el0uqTm7AZ8RYkZUHHsJNtTEvTh/c7e7gnHfx/eM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-t0adA3zBRA for <ai-control@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC52122312D1 for <ai-control@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2026 15:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c169ae1cb26so575311066b.1 for <ai-control@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1785621984; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20260327; b=pG9rMqOT70rn4bFXDZ3bofUg1dnPYFxdZcRI+7fkIzmlgpLw4AhxwzQToRjU2HDOxz lh+MInc5aOFU5nPAhE0t2Ac2LxMSSWRrLKd8OgaRsR6dF+HMLinz9eXDrt9XakBBoPNU YZwOD0LvlNQiNRi12h5jACXCI33x4up94ZiZFADK0xuDytNqA7NSmcK07DlhNcwa88Qj phfuMlsAeNB5UvCgkJlLxC60ovqVIjTEs4XirtfTFZGiqgWR1Ur8HvmASMt5oAWHJQRp o0DXyF4zlct3btRIwydov5XI0FypIEjCHA2N6NDfBzOxtBNB8kt79VmzWsVOcWpw7Ub9 tb+g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20260327; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=JzCMnuiNL8toA9PXQ7gu71PEZhOIFWYQwnArISN2ZRg=; fh=5UOc+PKyIrsY3SaS67TjARB7J7pyqIzgmzDgVag4KHM=; b=Cx7gVEkCDtevFkl0Hzh8bJDDZo72L4zordjIBGon4TlLxIkzjo0joaPoDIP2lzuEZo 5f+4NNjCWc0QKohge6O0v7Zw1M5tNLElsti5zyjM9HhDPN5sq3jwy/aGpoIKf3aS3u7L E5wj7X3K5/pWYVuhxBcpqqbjN5Eepf/sR//lDtC0bEG1MTqAZw3YwrZ3I0+u7RN0Sim4 vZy4DyeoGrlAuccowArFKieUGmt+7KpmrQLV/TDOzOtvfvxm2E6Hn2NJ2xHV0a8Ci+3p GoyC/mmVAgrd5PXN+ZbwYzOxgYfObW3p2da0d4UeBEGEyRyaQfkZgrJOJg15na6Yj66d DD3w==; darn=ietf.org
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1785621984; x=1786226784; darn=ietf.org; h=content-type:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=JzCMnuiNL8toA9PXQ7gu71PEZhOIFWYQwnArISN2ZRg=; b=rNaPWpjWAuTI678GVYomAv1AWFmRDUA8sr2avqokxk+eKqVcbOAAFI53hnyx1Dk08+ 4WOHzSp/tAZHuYzz8FPDQ9896nDMW8nAf4vkD1+vhqXGnsQiCK0mhz3MBo6ZE9eN6UH+ ZkWDuXNM+RPvcUxMvfqcNNgkw1zsuZXIrYDn1qm2dKGz1SNRV+VTc9YMEVRKXJR+Fmea Pw4xryD0xdFmy5vWxZEZtA86GGTT6m1JrQxeuYcJ7Cx/2C3MX7CZhvefcibAIE8EpD7m HdzzKCwyYltCaSY5BMqj/SNr0frDbt5ux8o6GLO4dE/T9XCz+WlJShZ9SY4BdNSWsdAM B52A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785621984; x=1786226784; h=content-type:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=JzCMnuiNL8toA9PXQ7gu71PEZhOIFWYQwnArISN2ZRg=; b=r1gZLTBUMSycrmyblcSJ37efdkkRvDGLu2DDTzOiN6dM+pR85WAmnNdD08JnxBeoJq +XTUbI737Ye39HKC88vPGTSjzt9CiqtkgvdOB7nOageDfc+uAnLijDFVj/3vYGAY9vGc 5iOwgCfL7RIskEfWN4jP6I6mNAfP0kK9IZM2EtkwK6OND5j86pOtyHZhDX14pLeQi4xt 24kE5hmkhSB1G9fkH8A2bBoOVvhgyCvI7XOvFynsRYYrq6WIgeYsKtHzdU8ATF3/J3JD vho+9nqWrwRjoxncTJjkNpG6RweT7T6+PwD33gS7AXlxyYg8rEAvluK80Ti7ipRQTnnP 9lxg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RqDe0CjIzygee2v5f/yeK0kPl3k43zzwSMoZ6NgU2IpOYlmO+4xHJft+KbYcXlWj+lD+mIRRpiuaMZL@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzKzMVOZNUrLCSlL5BI4hBHNl3jj/iD4U1S14iLpoRQ+U09fJI+ TME4/lE4iEA1mcslb2cnf/wvKILlA2bRfjh01kmXbGkaZWZO3U/TElv5RuRSiMRViuefT1JBdsR GLZCljJsRBwKFeDMmibc4/lkKEOqZLgA=
X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD1180YJNmft+tMlmqBeOJFJKS+UROgcPx8vpXwdROINtXk3MTukwNcEv2SQNL8p UpruRG/MPLjuKrO6/3pnsv5KIxIS0Ia+nBezTr2oRl2tJhYFIa999EKhOTeEjeT1MkNIwm9q0LP Tz7hFH2nUCxahKhsFvdd5LtfFn3gG5lVG3ldAsR9j8oeoYl7m60AJ139LLZIv0couBghLc0NBtc Y7oorHgYwVnWuUYygv4tuEEJAoc7gWNECs4mCqQu2ee2e6vcnPPSJ6r0iSIKEn8RXnJD9JRUAsg yl2+t5IREQ1yPXjiUzfnuOeJ3y3duZQdCnUFDZRdTizJ36XWsgGJl27ydzcUok4wZeg8fabFXVR O0YhXWo/vl0B0
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f58f:b0:c16:6be0:77d4 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c1fe79e4fdbmr341260066b.14.1785621984005; Sat, 01 Aug 2026 15:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKT3i-LuDBMLY72ZNbGHNbPExnWtYxHK1svcuKjjs7jEyNCnww@mail.gmail.com> <4hCGxc3Nlrz10Tr@fr-int-smtpout13.hostinger.io>
In-Reply-To: <4hCGxc3Nlrz10Tr@fr-int-smtpout13.hostinger.io>
From: Adam and Joanne Gallagher <inspiredtaste@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 12:06:11 -1000
X-Gm-Features: AUfX_mzNBiYqs9s-0qwARqejtRHCAiwTI8BK9ShwpjImX3BtT3lXpzwDVfG8zmI
Message-ID: <CAKT3i-LNvJNXKCVQrtGdVce4+8UD2zunZz1wiFEV7xOWsNm5ig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Hood <chris@nomotic.ai>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f575a06580384b5"
Message-ID-Hash: EOH6OOYETH7VANGNEV6HKR4CYG2PV3HW
X-Message-ID-Hash: EOH6OOYETH7VANGNEV6HKR4CYG2PV3HW
X-MailFrom: inspiredtaste@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Greg Lindahl <greg@commoncrawl.org>, Nate Hake <nate@travellemming.com>, ai-control@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" and "AI User Input" categories
List-Id: AI Control <ai-control.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ai-control/JNUvURUJqDUS_8EV0XPZRgZBAgA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ai-control>
List-Help: <mailto:ai-control-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ai-control-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ai-control@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ai-control-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ai-control-leave@ietf.org>
This is exactly the problem that needs exploring and vocabulary defined. Publishers would have to block Googlebot (indexing bot for search) which is also the training bot for AI Mode and AI Overviews to stop AI search models from consuming our content. We can only block Google-Extended which is only used to block training for Gemini Apps and Vertex AI API for Gemini. https://developers.google.com/crawling/docs/crawlers-fetchers/google-common-crawlers#google-extended Adam On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:57 AM Chris Hood <chris@nomotic.ai> wrote: > But there is no way to fix that. Your best option is to block content from > being consumed by AI models. > > Robots.txt is ideal for this. > > If you want AI models to access your content, then that comes with a > certain level of interpretation. > > How AI interprets and outputs is not going to change any time soon. > > Sorry. > > Chris > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Adam and Joanne Gallagher <inspiredtaste@gmail.com> > Date: 8/1/26 2:38 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: Chris Hood <chris@nomotic.ai> > Cc: Greg Lindahl <greg@commoncrawl.org>, Nate Hake <nate@travellemming.com>, > ai-control@ietf.org > Subject: [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" and "AI User > Input" categories > > I agree Chris. Right now AI outputs are often wildly inaccurate and people > are believing the outputs. This is hurting our brand and trust in general > because it is happening to all verticals in some form. Publishers need to > have preferences to limit how our content, brand name, and what type of > content is being used in outputs. AI outputs can never be fully controlled > but we need vocabulary to that helps defines preferences that publishers > desperately need. > > Adam > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:32 AM Chris Hood <chris@nomotic.ai> wrote: > >> Inference is a conclusion reaches on the basis of evidence and reasoning. >> >> AI inference is just letting AI reach the conclusion. >> >> The larger issue is that humans simply believe and accept the output as >> fact, which is greatly demonstrated by this thread. >> >> You'll never be able to control the accuracy of AI output. It's >> mathematical, and opinionated. One person's belief will rarely align with >> another's. >> >> The larger question becomes, who's truth is the correct truth? >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Adam and Joanne Gallagher <inspiredtaste@gmail.com> >> Date: 8/1/26 2:21 PM (GMT-08:00) >> To: Greg Lindahl <greg@commoncrawl.org>, Nate Hake < >> nate@travellemming.com> >> Cc: ai-control@ietf.org >> Subject: [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" and "AI User >> Input" categories >> >> Apologies for the second email. Here is another definition from IBM: >> https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-inference >> >> "In machine learning, AI inference is the act of using a trained AI >> model to make predictions on new data. Essentially, any instance of an >> artificial intelligence model actually generating outputs or making >> decisions in a real-world AI application constitutes AI inference. In >> simple terms, AI inference entails a trained model applying the patterns it >> learned from its training data to infer the correct output for a given >> input." >> >> AI inference is generating the output. >> >> Adam >> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:18 AM Adam and Joanne Gallagher < >> inspiredtaste@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Happy to hear your definition but this is the definition on the Google >>> document: >>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-ai-inference#how-does-ai-inference-work >>> >>> "Think of it this way: if training is like teaching an AI a new skill, >>> inference is that AI actually using the skill to do a job. It takes in new >>> data (like a photo or a piece of text) and produces an instant output, like >>> a prediction, generates a photo, or makes a decision. This is where AI >>> delivers business value. For anyone building with AI, understanding how to >>> make inference fast, scalable, and cost-effective is the key to creating >>> successful solutions." >>> >>> Adam >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:14 AM Greg Lindahl <greg@commoncrawl.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> That's not what AI Inference means. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 2:13 PM Adam and Joanne Gallagher < >>>> inspiredtaste@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> No, AI inference is producing AI recipes riddled with errors that use >>>>> our brand name to compete against us in search in the form of AI Overviews >>>>> and AI Mode outputs. I go into this in detail in my post I linked to. Here >>>>> is the link again: >>>>> https://www.inspiredtaste.net/101454/ai-recipes-harming-trust/ >>>>> >>>>> To review the definition of AI inference that is discussed on this >>>>> Google document: >>>>> https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-ai-inference. AI inference >>>>> is the computational process happening behind the scenes, and the AI >>>>> Overview is the final text output of the inference process. When someone >>>>> types a query into Google, the trained model takes the query and applies >>>>> what it learned to generate a unique summary. This execution phase of >>>>> taking the prompt and producing an output is by definition AI inference. >>>>> Bottom line, AI inference is doing the harm and we don't have >>>>> preferences to stop this from happening. As a publisher of information this >>>>> is a major problem and the entire open web currently has this problem. >>>>> >>>>> Adam >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 11:00 AM Greg Lindahl <greg@commoncrawl.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> > AI inference is what is proactively being used in search at global >>>>>> scales which is causing grave harm to our business. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you harmed by AI inference intending to suppress pornography in >>>>>> search results? >>>>>> >>>>>> One great thing about the IETF process is that it brings together >>>>>> many communities -- in this case, both publishers and search engine >>>>>> implementers. >>>>>> >>>>>> This particular topic has come up several times in the past. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- greg >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 1:19 PM Adam and Joanne Gallagher < >>>>>> inspiredtaste@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I completely agree with Nate on this. AI inference is what is >>>>>>> proactively being used in search at global scales which is causing grave >>>>>>> harm to our business. We currently don't have any inference preferences to >>>>>>> stop it without removing ourselves from AI outputs entirely. With the lines >>>>>>> between organic index search and AI search being blurred at alarming rates >>>>>>> this would be insane for us to do. It is essentially a hostage situation >>>>>>> right now. Here is a detailed post that describes how AI inference is >>>>>>> misrepresenting our brand and competing against us with our content at >>>>>>> scales never before seen. It is wildly unsustainable. Article link: >>>>>>> https://www.inspiredtaste.net/101454/ai-recipes-harming-trust/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Our business desperately needs preferences to stop this from >>>>>>> happening as soon as possible. Putting aside the training on our content >>>>>>> that has already happened without our permission, inference is what is >>>>>>> causing (doing) harm to our business in the form of AI misinformation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Publishers need to have much more control of inference. It should be >>>>>>> a core mission of this working group to define inference preferences and >>>>>>> vocabulary. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Adam Gallagher >>>>>>> Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes >>>>>>> for Home Cooks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ai-control mailing list -- ai-control@ietf.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to ai-control-leave@ietf.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Adam and Joanne Gallagher >>>>> Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes for >>>>> Home Cooks >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Adam and Joanne Gallagher >>> Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes for >>> Home Cooks >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Adam and Joanne Gallagher >> Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes for >> Home Cooks >> >> > > -- > Adam and Joanne Gallagher > Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes for Home > Cooks > > -- Adam and Joanne Gallagher Inspired Taste <https://www.inspiredtaste.net/>* - *Easy Recipes for Home Cooks
- [ai-control] Proposed "AI System Inference" and "… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Sebastian Posth
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Farzaneh Badiei
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Laurent Le Meur
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Farzaneh Badiei
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Jo Levy
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Greg Lindahl
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Alissa Cooper
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Sebastian Posth
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Farzaneh Badiei
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Timid Robot Zehta
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Farzaneh Badiei
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Matt Rogerson
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Timid Robot Zehta
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Bradley Silver
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Bradley Silver
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Farzaneh Badiei
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Paul Keller
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Needham
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Eric Rescorla
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Martin Thomson
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Eric Rescorla
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Martin Thomson
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Eric Rescorla
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Tyler Martin
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Alissa Cooper
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Laurent Le Meur
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Greg Lindahl
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Greg Lindahl
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Greg Lindahl
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Nate Hake
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Leonard Rosenthol
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Needham
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Chris Hood
- [ai-control] Re: Proposed "AI System Inference" a… Adam and Joanne Gallagher