IETF Logo Mail Archive

[alto] Question about unified framework for properties

Lingli Deng <lingli.deng@outlook.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lingli.deng@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F4D1B35DB for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3GlDz_4nxIa3 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BAY004-OMC2S15.hotmail.com (bay004-omc2s15.hotmail.com [65.54.190.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90DF81B35D6 for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BAY167-W31 ([65.54.190.123]) by BAY004-OMC2S15.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:54:25 -0700
X-TMN: [qZt8rvHllIGvhHPQBhYX7xVMdhFDClDw69cvKh8rqpk=]
X-Originating-Email: [lingli.deng@outlook.com]
Message-ID: <BAY167-W317FB9F86A15B155938130F3B40@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_cbbc6224-d06c-4d29-8b4a-ebf23e2795c6_"
From: Lingli Deng <lingli.deng@outlook.com>
To: "w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com" <w.roome@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:54:25 +0000
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2015 06:54:25.0580 (UTC) FILETIME=[20F7A6C0:01D09DCA]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/2UPIfwklLLXiCDgq9nAkW9xkZ94>
Cc: "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Subject: [alto] Question about unified framework for properties
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:54:27 -0000

Hi Wendy,
I am currently working on a revision for draft on Extended endpoint properties (I.D-draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext),  and noticed there is concern about potential overlap during last meeting with your proposal on a unified framework for properties.I am afraid that I was not there for the onsite discussion, but after reading your slides, I feel it seems to be orthogonal with endpoint properties. What do you think?BTW, I could not find any draft for the proposed framework. Are you working on such a document or is there anybody else doing this? If so, I would be happy to read it and double check its relevance with or effect on our work on endpoint properties.
Regards,Lingli

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email