[alto] [ALTO CDNI] Discussion Points in this interim and Jensen will be the presenter
Shawn Lin <x.shawn.lin@gmail.com> Sun, 09 December 2018 15:43 UTC
Return-Path: <x.shawn.lin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82593127AC2; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 07:43:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ixmA4dnoXLg2; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 07:43:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B0312785F; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 07:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x23so7107017oix.3; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 07:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bBPdi3UQsSXogVMXpsmliC+VXNHcKseAzMlHs/KQVy0=; b=vB/N2A4zL1zU2/EGOwF+25yrgEtRBbwFkuV5pbci+52vFMSFKyRKX6OGocK2qJk+5D cdgwlwgT7VF4/Sd8kMnRyNTHS6HKuT8WkrB2PyXNQIJ8f/nkzTNq75LtPYEiiwI3p106 srEtgmU1aJg5C80i+hqK8N4RIZjOw84g/ZN8yu4/izw2jOm1oZXVJ6fDPI61vgLz5aKr iu1MiU2zy3FPkbBqUFTZjgRTTnpdvqt5b57fZDkoD0BvDJ1RbYLkwznsjFKUPDC5gtgy /jyKq6W5TiB0jvHW47+S3zXMEe7adN9JnFBbMx4Q8qAOKyiko7pLr8uH/j8hlKgB3iDl 4ZhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bBPdi3UQsSXogVMXpsmliC+VXNHcKseAzMlHs/KQVy0=; b=rPVpmGaWP/IH0nIKglMg2GsoSJuDCYQft5MGfjDRG/+PGHHnuikc1eyHdyvuzy89h/ 3QBxnsqKXrHjSu29rjq3u34eFitEuYwBofvUK67+0ZJ5NFTTKVZ2rOc4l8/tzxjh2Edn U5IVByElOPdDi0ufKkM6sS4BICZkSsFoTnGlChJ9PbQGQeB/XyQvwAluNKBvGFxT1uQZ xKgmB02UNqjwFe6u8WzkTVjxSzggkKVmtJ+f98MsWjpxF8E0TqYZRJV63W1GXH3qU7KU GeKapovo8u/5f/nKoKZV8MP54+8VFpIRklMR32rj9nSE+fn0WzFMRA/KV5LkUyS0EgWb 8z0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaNpzyCc9TFCCai8Q20+Oo7luCVThdU7JU+arSwfNQbQu8IptIF xWFpE36eCtx2xJj8FUeOQiKCTowS46bZ9+X6AbU4jekN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UYpQXwbkZ/sWQVdr1P3dcTgcSQDjfX1wEQH+I5mhBEKxOuKfduXkIx1RGL2geMbssjlyLscNsp2McJWWNVc1k=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3ed6:: with SMTP id l205mr5848693oia.158.1544370216684; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 07:43:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Shawn Lin <x.shawn.lin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 23:43:25 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+oaSDpi-xuM+medwG35Uwkj3DJVfUC5obaAkLiD2WUi40a8aA@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-alto-cdni-request-routing-alto@ietf.org
Cc: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ad1ef057c98b654"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/ETABWwYXHSnk3SRZX6MS_i8j7GM>
Subject: [alto] [ALTO CDNI] Discussion Points in this interim and Jensen will be the presenter
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 15:43:42 -0000
Dear ALTOers, For ALTO CDNI draft, there are two points that may need to be discussed in this interim meeting. 1. The motivation of filtering on capabilities/filtering on footprints may not be strong enough. Is it proper for us to send Email to CDNI WG and ask comments from them? 2. The current structure of capabilities with footprints may not be suitable for map representation (no primary key). One potential solution is to merge entries with the same CDNI capability so that we can use the CDNI capability as the primary key. But it is not efficient in some cases. We will discuss it at the meeting. Sorry, I do not have time to attend the meeting this time, so Jensen will be the presenter for CDNI. @Jensen, thank you so much for your help! Bests, Shawn Lin