Re: [alto] Questions on ALTO elements identified in the ALTO problem statement
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Tue, 07 July 2009 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: alto@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E727A28C4DF for <alto@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UlpM56Cx5RBu for <alto@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.252.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBDA28C551 for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z69-94-196-249.ips.direcpath.com ([69.94.196.249]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1MOGQG-0000p1-Ph; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:33:49 -0700
Message-Id: <934459C7-9565-40A5-9016-13C6B9DE1F1D@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <010101c9fe8e$610776a0$5c0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-97-252589288"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:34:05 -0400
References: <20090703150002.027D53A6DBB@core3.amsl.com> <010101c9fe8e$610776a0$5c0c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: alto@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [alto] Questions on ALTO elements identified in the ALTO problem statement
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:34:18 -0000
All of the "elements" are logical. Whether an element is instantiated on a big honking mainframe at a service provider or a distributed p2p ring, is simply an implementation matter. However, we need to talk about a well-known, locatable "service" that offer the ALTO "stuff." We tend to call that thing a "server." On Jul 6, 2009, at 7:06 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote: > ALTO problem statement depicted architecture of the ALTO server and > ALTO > client. I find this "ALTO Server" is not very practical. > > For public servers which provide contents (like video streaming), they > already registered at DHCP which provides ways for individual users > to find > the optimal route to the nearest server. > > For pure P2P applications, the duration of the applications is short > and > chance of them re-appearing is not high. Therefore it will be > difficult for > ALTO server to maintain all the needed information to achieve the > optimization. Besides, what motivate P2P software to provide a hook > to ALTO > server? > > Linda Dunbar > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: alto-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:alto-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of > Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 10:00 AM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: alto@ietf.org > Subject: [alto] I-D Action:draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic > Optimization > Working Group of the IETF. > > > Title : Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) > Problem Statement > Author(s) : J. Seedorf, E. Burger > Filename : draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2009-07-03 > > Peer-to-peer applications, such as file sharing, real-time > communication, and live and on-demand media streaming use a > significant amount of Internet resources. Such applications often > transfer large amounts of data in peer-to-peer connections. However, > they usually have little knowledge of the underlying network > topology. As a result, they may choose their peers randomly with > respect to the underlying network topology or they may choose their > peers based on measurements and statistics that, in many situations, > may lead to suboptimal choices. This document describes problems > related to improving traffic generated by peer-to-peer applications. > In particular, this document discusses issues which better-than- > random peer selection based on network-layer information may raise. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
- [alto] Questions on ALTO elements identified in t… Linda Dunbar
- [alto] I-D Action:draft-ietf-alto-problem-stateme… Internet-Drafts
- Re: [alto] Questions on ALTO elements identified … Eric Burger