Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-05: (with COMMENT)

Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de> Mon, 29 July 2019 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AA912001A; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-3deLrazQw5; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de (gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de [IPv6:2a02:a00:e000:116::41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835BD120019; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p200300e7ef02d6003285a9fffe406c00.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:e7:ef02:d600:3285:a9ff:fe40:6c00]:52556 helo=blafasel.ehlo.wurstkaes.de) by gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>) id 1hsAaU-0003Jz-Ev; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:41:34 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:41:32 +0200
From: Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, alto-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc@ietf.org, jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de, alto@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190729184132.GA6931@blafasel.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
References: <156340393916.25833.11508102922044405602.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <156340393916.25833.11508102922044405602.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: my personal mail account
Accept-Languages: en, de
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/KxClFZjbfZvP46qdiH4hzqLDCVQ>
Subject: Re: [alto] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:41:44 -0000

Hi, 

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 03:52:19PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-05: No Objection
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> However, I do think that we need to clarify in Section 5.2.2 that this
> mechanism is compatible with the BCP 20 sub-allocation scheme only
> insamuch as you can add NAPTR records in the relevant locations -- the
> current procedures described in the text will not catch everything
> just on their own, IIUC.

Thanks for your feedback and sorry that I have to ask, but 
could you please be more specific about what you think is still missing?

Thanks
Sebastian