Re: [alto] ALTO Protocol Outstanding Issue II: Unifying cost-mode and cost-type to a single type

Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Thu, 21 February 2013 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB88721F8860 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:37:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lD6hzAjWgiHb for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2539B21F8916 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 03:37:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA1E103379 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:37:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2HBViRwfxLXH for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:37:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F01103378 for <alto@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.1.1.190] (10.1.1.190) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:57 +0100
Message-ID: <512606D9.4000702@neclab.eu>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:57 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alto@ietf.org
References: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060408FF52EF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45A697A8FFD7CF48BCF2BE7E106F060408FF52EF@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.190]
Subject: Re: [alto] ALTO Protocol Outstanding Issue II: Unifying cost-mode and cost-type to a single type
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:37:03 -0000

[writing without my AD hat on]

Hi all,


On 01/29/2013 12:08 AM, Reinaldo Penno (repenno) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please send your comments to the list in the next 2 weeks. Silence
> means we will go with the proposal.
>
> Discussion II: Unifying cost-mode and cost-type to a single type
>
> e.g., routingcost-num and routingcost-ord
>
> Having a single type simples the protocol since there is just one
> parameter when indicating cost. But it will impact current
> implementations and might loose flexibility.
>
> Proposal: Leave it as is.

wfm.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Reinaldo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>

-- 
martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe
NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office:
Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End  Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB
Registered in England 2832014