Re: [alto] Introducing costs for wireless networks

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18336129541 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPsWKHoDU7Ln for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180FD1294D4 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DIT56397; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:06:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:06:39 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.43]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:06:33 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR)" <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>, IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Introducing costs for wireless networks
Thread-Index: AdKZojiEUqpNUxTCQp64Vr71m8gmugCJRQnQ
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:06:32 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A797697@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <A7A5844EB93EB94AB22C2068B10AD65A017F974862@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <A7A5844EB93EB94AB22C2068B10AD65A017F974862@FR711WXCHMBA01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.78.218]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9A797697nkgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.58C64501.00BD, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.43, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0df5452f0b1d818e73e06b061a95edc5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/QQ5pPm2loeAuJlyoUoGVXv3okxY>
Subject: Re: [alto] Introducing costs for wireless networks
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:06:46 -0000

Hi, Sabine:
Interesting topic, I think if this Cellular connection cost is needed? It should go to ALTO performance metric draft, right?
I also believe Cost value context is very valuable since it allows expose several value for a single metric. But this cost value context is technology specific?
Or you want to have a generic schme for cost value context?
In addition, I want to know whether Celluar costs is used to measure cell congestion or cell load? How do you measure it in the wireless networks? Is there any 3GPP specification we can reference?

-Qin
发件人: alto [mailto:alto-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR)
发送时间: 2017年3月10日 21:30
收件人: IETF ALTO
主题: [alto] Introducing costs for wireless networks

Hi all,

Any thoughts in the WG on the following?
Thanks,
Sabine

Pursuant to previous ALTO work on wireless networks and relating to the WG item on ALTO metrics, there are a number of abstracted metrics reporting on cellular and wireless networks worth considering. For instance, applications on UEs may like to know about the connection costs associated to the cells it is likely to connect to. These costs may for instance be impacted by the cell load, see section 2.1 of [draft-randriamasy-alto-cost-context].

Using cellular costs requires introducing a new address type and a new identifier namespace for cells. Based on 3GPP standards, we may opt for the name space "ECGI" and the related address format as suggested in section 4 of [draft-rauschenbach-alto-wireless-access] that also proposes that to map cells to PIDs covering cell IDs.

Cellular connection costs (CCC for short) can be conveyed by for instance the (Filtered) Cost Map (FCM) service or an extension of the Endpoint Property (EPS) that could be added to [draft-roome-alto-unified-props].

A PID in a Network Map can cover a cell with an address from the address space "ECGI". A PID thus hides the underlying technical aspects. The CCC in a F/CM between a UE and a cell/PID can be encoded in the bi-directional, uplink and downlink directions, within or across PIDs.  A UE can retrieve its “serving PID” via the Endpoint Property "PID" applied to its service cell ID.