Re: [alto] 答复: Way forward for the Resdistribution

[Martin Stiemerling <[e-mail]>]

Yingjie,

I had basically the same questions and it seems that Rich Alimi has
something in the pipe.

  Martin

On 07/04/2012 03:23 AM, Guyingjie (Yingjie) wrote:
> Hi Martin and all,
> The base protocol used to refer to draft-gu-alto-redistribution, and I am one of the authors, together with Richard and Roni.
> Is there any plan for the new dedicated redistribution draft, e.g. contributors and draft plan?
> 
> I am not very active in ALTO for sometime, so I maybe miss some discussion in the mail list on redistribution.
> Personally, I would suggest to awake the draft-gu-alto-redistribution, since there is many detail technical considerations for redistribution. Or at least we should take the Basic requirements and ALTO Redistribution Solutions Analysis to the new draft if there is any.
> 
> Best Regards
> Gu Yingjie
> 
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Martin Stiemerling
> 发送时间: 2012年7月3日 乐乐21:20
> 收件人: Richard Alimi
> 抄送: [e-mail]
> 主题: Re: [alto] Way forward for the Resdistribution
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/02/2012 07:37 PM, Richard Alimi wrote:
>> The material has been migrated to another document locally, but it
>> isn't yet ready for submission.    I don't think it should be
>> completely abandoned, but in my opinion the priority is lower than
>> getting the base protocol.  As was mentioned in the discussion w.r.t.
>> requirements, there are some things that it provides such as
>> guidelines on which clients should make use of the information and for
>> how long (above and beyond what we get for free from HTTP caching).
>>
>> With your AD hat on, do we need the additional document to be
>> explicitly mentioned in the charter?
> 
> It would be good to see this draft submitted. Getting a new milestone
> for this is not a big deal if the WG is in agreement.
> 
>     Martin
> 
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Martin Stiemerling
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have just read the ALTO protocol slides of the meeting in Paris and do
>>> wonder what has ultimately happened to the redistribution, as the slide
>>> state:
>>>
>>> "Will be submitted as separate draft that may make use of JOSE"
>>> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/83/slides/slides-83-alto-2.pdf)
>>>
>>> This functionality is gone from the base protocol, but we do not have any
>>> replacement insight. Do we completely abandon this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>     Martin
>>> --
>>> [e-mail]
>>>
>>> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
>>> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
>>> Registered in England 283
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> alto mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
> 

-- 
[e-mail]

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
Registered in England 283