Re: [alto] FW: New Version Notification for draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt

邓灵莉/Lingli Deng <denglingli@chinamobile.com> Wed, 02 July 2014 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <denglingli@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659FE1B28D0 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrA6IeAiePlS for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 730BB1B28CB for <alto@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 22:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.17]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee353b39b66dc4-5ddc4; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:40:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee353b39b66dc4-5ddc4
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.43.183]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee953b39b6580c-e688b; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:40:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee953b39b6580c-e688b
From: 邓灵莉/Lingli Deng <denglingli@chinamobile.com>
To: "'Y. Richard Yang'" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
References: <003301cf91f3$0a3d6570$1eb83050$@com> <CANUuoLpWgMGsRB8e9x_QyH41YjyU-bpfuy=PRFrqft9Ur7cJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANUuoLpWgMGsRB8e9x_QyH41YjyU-bpfuy=PRFrqft9Ur7cJ9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 13:40:55 +0800
Message-ID: <01e601cf95b8$31e228e0$95a67aa0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01E7_01CF95FB.400568E0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac+SHt/kMPtgKz9VS8aCgkPO0t3oGwDmBH0Q
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/YjE_LGrWBEiE0bZxawPpuuMs524
Cc: 'IETF ALTO' <alto@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [alto] FW: New Version Notification for draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 05:40:58 -0000

Hi Richard,

 

Thanks for your review and comments.

We are currently working on another revision with hope that it would address at least some of the issues here.

More inline.

 

Lingli

 

From: yang.r.yang@gmail.com [mailto:yang.r.yang@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Y. Richard Yang
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:46 PM
To: 邓灵莉/Lingli Deng
Cc: IETF ALTO
Subject: Re: [alto] FW: New Version Notification for draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt

 

Hi Lingli, Sebastian, Haibin,

 

Interesting doc!  I am wondering the possibility of you adding an overview section to discuss the potential types of end point properties and your design guidelines so that we have a better understanding of the design:

[邓灵莉/Lingli Deng] Good idea. I shall try to incorporate this discussion in the next revision.

 

- For example, I do not have a feeling that the properties that the current draft defined are relatively complete. What is the potential set of properties and why you choose the ones?

 

- One can convey the properties in multiple ways. For example, the current draft defines p2p_caching as a boolean. Another design possibility is to define a generic type with values including "p2p_cache", "super_peer", ...

 

As another example we consider volume related property. The current draft defines a boolean. Another alternative is to use an numeric value of the exact cap.

 

Another example is access network type.  I saw the previous discussion on issues that technology types become obsolete and hence the change to avoid use them. One comment is that knowing network type can provide information about behaviors that an application may use -- Sebastian's comment has alluded to this as well. For example, by knowing that the end point is on an UMTS network, an application can understand that it will have the RRC statement machine running (DCH to FACH after 5 sec idle and FACH to IDLE after 12 sec idle) and hence the implications on power consumption as well as techniques to reduce energy (e.g., http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~fengqian/paper/thesis.pdf). 

 

Is there a guiding principal that guides the selection and the approach of you define the properties (e.g., minimal information, no redundancy)?

[邓灵莉/Lingli Deng] Indeed, we may stick to a general principle and derived certain guidelines to be used when selecting and defining such properties.

 

 

Also, the updated charter defines a set of 4 questions that one may evaluate. It can be helpful if you discuss them when defining each property.

 

Richard

 

 

 

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:32 AM, 邓灵莉/Lingli Deng <denglingli@chinamobile.com> wrote:

Hi all,

We just submitted a new version of the end point property draft.
Hope it addresses the comments from the list discussion.

Your comments and suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Lingli

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:28 PM
> To: Haibin Song; Haibin Song; Deng Lingli; Sebastian Kiesel; Lingli Deng;
> Sebastian Kiesel
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Lingli Deng and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:         draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext
> Revision:     02
> Title:                End Point Properties for Peer Selection
> Document date:        2014-06-27
> Group:                Individual Submission
> Pages:                7
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-deng-alto-p2p-ext-02
>
> Abstract:
>    The initial purpose for ALTO protocol is to provide better than
>    random peer selection for p2p networks.  The peer selection method
>    does not only depend on the peer location, but also on other
>    properties of a peering node.  In this document, we define additional
>    endpoint properties.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat




_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto





 

-- 

-- 

 =====================================

| Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu>   |

| Professor of Computer Science       |

| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |

 =====================================