Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt

"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Mon, 03 July 2017 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E9E12EAF7 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwWGC5hbMcR7 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3131A129B34 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r103so234529806wrb.0 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x4s38bJ51cBLuMVyEZS5Zv4f64fe+66t2ptMWyFdHsg=; b=fCm/BUXQhEeaqXtFi+dRIaRlTcEEmudEh7nlT5femSfaieQmE1uicUbwirKs0jub/o RX7C0kYXmEWRCM6Xqgg8iJQIohSnDXJtjP/xcLB9Hs3G1qOy0IJAcGNOt2tX1klKDnhO 7U5c1O2r51hvuhqbRAVgJexbkECkBuRH+97YPcGFe+9euo1SH1tcmTDvrkaF2U5TvG5j 9DL4N6AGeJSocyXBD8Y7YwK6/5FBBR1rwLp6Eb/0ySSeTeT0pcuoha1NumhaLzI5SH1X 7y9TlmNpyHcmy1Cr1HoEdjg9w8VTXP0CMhC6ULp3VVGDBViv3OrRNrbNiKd0UGu3Hzpw yDZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=x4s38bJ51cBLuMVyEZS5Zv4f64fe+66t2ptMWyFdHsg=; b=lddPrTZQzbsPc+7qpUFLzn6jz19clSIxs3Zne/nqOUqxrBVfNfEMjriEVgDmxBbThK nj5mBlx5Qtp5/ZZJlRQ4O1ODUcYyygzKPvAeVHlIkMluuoku2dsYPs1iLPhZM7NnbVML xNPnYHO0fGBnU5vF4qd4UajTUxEKuFgflnfozzAaYZ3GXg9rF9j1mfMpZrruajmap3Lt +hWs34vvjTazvxEoynJWY1zFgakt8Jy/TX9AFOdTYB80bIHl/snYZ81s1ARjVysAiWur TAAHFZOgQsM0VE00pVhHmPMzVCblAJA5GN8p726ppBs312yCFlZk3WYmTYYtFpwbyyTt Ad4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxd4QI+WtCcm5UqnX8CerX/1gkpMRTx0+dtpcS32uvnaE8AptbY i2dU8U9V1taElNdtLCrkImdJyVvV0D8V
X-Received: by 10.223.177.201 with SMTP id r9mr36068757wra.36.1499088316607; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yang.r.yang@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.71.89 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:25:16 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vCuqTGPiHomVq1MC4i_DUk2Cs6s
Message-ID: <CANUuoLoLXAUMfNb8+Tw4iqsPntYib-zd0nwjRQzKSi4bmaVmmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e7e969953c2055369b276"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Zvj_iLuNUQVCBV2V9I3DvBJojnI>
Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:25:21 -0000

Dear all,

We have finally added JSON Patch (application/json-patch+json) as an
allowed incremental encoding format. This is reflected in -07.

Now, ALTO incremental updates can use both JSON patch and JSON merge patch.
Although both are complete, in that they can represent all changes, they
have different encoding efficiencies: JSON patch can work well for arrays,
and JSON Merge Patch (application/merge-patch+json), is cleaner in the
general case, in particular for key-value based objects.  As much as we
want to keep simplicity, we see use cases where both are needed. There is a
possibility to develop a unifying incremental encoding scheme, but we opt
to use existing techniques whenever possible.

We feel that this is a quite powerful, elegant mechanism. My hat off to
Wendy, who came up w/ the design.

Any comments will be greatly apprecIiated!

Richard

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:13 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization of
> the IETF.
>
>         Title           : ALTO Incremental Updates Using Server-Sent
> Events (SSE)
>         Authors         : Wendy Roome
>                           Y. Richard Yang
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt
>         Pages           : 40
>         Date            : 2017-07-03
>
> Abstract:
>    The Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) [RFC7285] protocol
>    provides network related information, called network information
>    resources, to client applications so that clients can make informed
>    decisions in utilizing network resources.  For example, an ALTO
>    server can provide network and cost maps so that an ALTO client can
>    use the maps to determine the costs between endpoints when choosing
>    communicating endpoints.
>
>    However, the ALTO protocol does not define a mechanism to allow an
>    ALTO client to obtain updates to the information resources, other
>    than by periodically re-fetching them.  Because some information
>    resources (e.g., the aforementioned maps) may be large (potentially
>    tens of megabytes), and because only parts of the information
>    resources may change frequently (e.g., only some entries in a cost
>    map), complete re-fetching can be extremely inefficient.
>
>    This document presents a mechanism to allow an ALTO server to push
>    updates to ALTO clients, to achieve two benefits: (1) Updates can be
>    immediate, in that the server can send updates as soon as they are
>    available; and (2) Updates are incremental, in that if only a small
>    section of an information resource changes, the server can send just
>    the changes.
>
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
>



-- 
-- 
 =====================================
| Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu>   |
| Professor of Computer Science       |
| http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/        |
 =====================================