Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt
"Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu> Mon, 03 July 2017 13:25 UTC
Return-Path: <yang.r.yang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E9E12EAF7 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwWGC5hbMcR7 for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3131A129B34 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r103so234529806wrb.0 for <alto@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x4s38bJ51cBLuMVyEZS5Zv4f64fe+66t2ptMWyFdHsg=; b=fCm/BUXQhEeaqXtFi+dRIaRlTcEEmudEh7nlT5femSfaieQmE1uicUbwirKs0jub/o RX7C0kYXmEWRCM6Xqgg8iJQIohSnDXJtjP/xcLB9Hs3G1qOy0IJAcGNOt2tX1klKDnhO 7U5c1O2r51hvuhqbRAVgJexbkECkBuRH+97YPcGFe+9euo1SH1tcmTDvrkaF2U5TvG5j 9DL4N6AGeJSocyXBD8Y7YwK6/5FBBR1rwLp6Eb/0ySSeTeT0pcuoha1NumhaLzI5SH1X 7y9TlmNpyHcmy1Cr1HoEdjg9w8VTXP0CMhC6ULp3VVGDBViv3OrRNrbNiKd0UGu3Hzpw yDZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=x4s38bJ51cBLuMVyEZS5Zv4f64fe+66t2ptMWyFdHsg=; b=lddPrTZQzbsPc+7qpUFLzn6jz19clSIxs3Zne/nqOUqxrBVfNfEMjriEVgDmxBbThK nj5mBlx5Qtp5/ZZJlRQ4O1ODUcYyygzKPvAeVHlIkMluuoku2dsYPs1iLPhZM7NnbVML xNPnYHO0fGBnU5vF4qd4UajTUxEKuFgflnfozzAaYZ3GXg9rF9j1mfMpZrruajmap3Lt +hWs34vvjTazvxEoynJWY1zFgakt8Jy/TX9AFOdTYB80bIHl/snYZ81s1ARjVysAiWur TAAHFZOgQsM0VE00pVhHmPMzVCblAJA5GN8p726ppBs312yCFlZk3WYmTYYtFpwbyyTt Ad4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxd4QI+WtCcm5UqnX8CerX/1gkpMRTx0+dtpcS32uvnaE8AptbY i2dU8U9V1taElNdtLCrkImdJyVvV0D8V
X-Received: by 10.223.177.201 with SMTP id r9mr36068757wra.36.1499088316607; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yang.r.yang@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.71.89 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 06:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Y. Richard Yang" <yry@cs.yale.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:25:16 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: vCuqTGPiHomVq1MC4i_DUk2Cs6s
Message-ID: <CANUuoLoLXAUMfNb8+Tw4iqsPntYib-zd0nwjRQzKSi4bmaVmmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF ALTO <alto@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e7e969953c2055369b276"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/Zvj_iLuNUQVCBV2V9I3DvBJojnI>
Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:25:21 -0000
Dear all, We have finally added JSON Patch (application/json-patch+json) as an allowed incremental encoding format. This is reflected in -07. Now, ALTO incremental updates can use both JSON patch and JSON merge patch. Although both are complete, in that they can represent all changes, they have different encoding efficiencies: JSON patch can work well for arrays, and JSON Merge Patch (application/merge-patch+json), is cleaner in the general case, in particular for key-value based objects. As much as we want to keep simplicity, we see use cases where both are needed. There is a possibility to develop a unifying incremental encoding scheme, but we opt to use existing techniques whenever possible. We feel that this is a quite powerful, elegant mechanism. My hat off to Wendy, who came up w/ the design. Any comments will be greatly apprecIiated! Richard On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 9:13 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization of > the IETF. > > Title : ALTO Incremental Updates Using Server-Sent > Events (SSE) > Authors : Wendy Roome > Y. Richard Yang > Filename : draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07.txt > Pages : 40 > Date : 2017-07-03 > > Abstract: > The Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) [RFC7285] protocol > provides network related information, called network information > resources, to client applications so that clients can make informed > decisions in utilizing network resources. For example, an ALTO > server can provide network and cost maps so that an ALTO client can > use the maps to determine the costs between endpoints when choosing > communicating endpoints. > > However, the ALTO protocol does not define a mechanism to allow an > ALTO client to obtain updates to the information resources, other > than by periodically re-fetching them. Because some information > resources (e.g., the aforementioned maps) may be large (potentially > tens of megabytes), and because only parts of the information > resources may change frequently (e.g., only some entries in a cost > map), complete re-fetching can be extremely inefficient. > > This document presents a mechanism to allow an ALTO server to push > updates to ALTO clients, to achieve two benefits: (1) Updates can be > immediate, in that the server can send updates as soon as they are > available; and (2) Updates are incremental, in that if only a small > section of an information resource changes, the server can send just > the changes. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-07 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > alto@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto > -- -- ===================================== | Y. Richard Yang <yry@cs.yale.edu> | | Professor of Computer Science | | http://www.cs.yale.edu/~yry/ | =====================================
- [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-ss… internet-drafts
- Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-incr-updat… Y. Richard Yang