[alto] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03: (with COMMENT)

Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 30 May 2022 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: alto@ietf.org
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CB1C14792F; Mon, 30 May 2022 04:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode@ietf.org, alto-chairs@ietf.org, alto@ietf.org, kaigao@scu.edu.cn, kaigao@scu.edu.cn
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.3.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <165391094388.4538.10491428423390996165@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 04:42:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/_ZCGubmE74Jg1TJ0ul-QuwFKM1I>
Subject: [alto] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:42:23 -0000

Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# GEN AD review of draft-ietf-alto-cost-mode-03

CC @larseggert

Thanks to Roni Even for the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) review
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/xlaIzXHKY1NzjJRJpuXpzKwP4rc).

## Comments

### Section 1, paragraph 4
```
     Additional cost modes are required for specific ALTO deployment cases
     (e.g., [I-D.ietf-alto-path-vector]).  In order to allow for such use
     cases, this document relaxes the constraint imposed by the base ALTO
     specification on allowed cost modes (Section 3) and creates a new
     ALTO registry to track new cost modes (Section 4).
```
I second Rob's DISCUSS, i.e., it's not clear at all that current ALTO
implementations will handle this protocol parameter now taking on
values other than "numerical" or "ordinal" without explicit
negotiation.

I will let Rob hold the DISCUSS, but will monitor the discussion to
see if this issue will be addressed.

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool