Re: [alto] Chair review of draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-17

Vijay Gurbani <> Wed, 08 January 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA8812018B; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 05:32:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aXcUk4xVcgKp; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 05:32:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7F61200F4; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 05:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id v28so2515771edw.12; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 05:32:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3vXPb/Nb6XOUiT2CQjWolutx7KLSNG2wJeGwLIlrHdU=; b=caTPelGt0ZLcx6OaUGxYhrbnQRrR7NBjddZP2hFuqFWt3A6o4oe8BVyWuqaa/9L2xs tkvcwI1XPnnB56YepvULmhAvDFj9fN6u9+4tYKpG9uMFVDphdTF1Zvbh2lnZMYOMBm4X om1wNlgqbfxgmWV8NTqZw+zydMI+zYnRMOy2fToHlw60uD5SZjlCF0NkPx7rTyx1Pc0L gNc9hs1CkcvDMIe1Tj0pKpgHVwtht+M4VHyvojMzQYQPs4INu5pQVkYZSgO6mWhZdI8L AcoIOTxjq6DuvsMg7uMsH82vF4HiOVOra3FP3b/kR7OALspnE52a2R99oYvFvVuFegdy xHrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3vXPb/Nb6XOUiT2CQjWolutx7KLSNG2wJeGwLIlrHdU=; b=tI3l6M/v/Nq1dWQi8ndVNnYI4z1EQ3GFAOJXbAA7T+p2le1ISygEbUjyHXhze2HSrk PeaP8PXmf4JLVy3x6tvK2CbURwAJoVRBgWqQV6BpFVRa+7rPy843C7fky0yPZXsyLuqH eee6ELgA1v8xzWap5bEbSQ8H9slvHwZTHiFeFWEqKzYXI+KSOYxHyfSrVb1q7+9Jy6m+ B6pj4N7AnGRQ1Qn36rYQ0Fm8qtlrA+Xzu+Nfvpru/Nk8R2eq3u4d+FBTTnDxhmkr+41F EyJGpdOD7E03+9rLLF5zdlR8+x0zuw2gNg+01UrMRRELc9EM6dh8rwHxk47qu3U14VZx owxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNMIxmezTuXLcZKdeVDgdxV52AFlA1Lxaua6Jv6U3vQtNAC9DA QzOO1tYd2c1d63P6EvMAOvNqs+z9+Lb58PSK4T0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwWZ81C2NH2XKQj2yaTC0eHe7N9E5SsnhnFK5SlO25ub6I0v9tyCH+FXdfQkiJfdK1mLyN+tBKGyhrCwD1X49Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7006:: with SMTP id n6mr5047309ejj.1.1578490346190; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 05:32:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Vijay Gurbani <>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 07:32:13 -0600
Message-ID: <>
To: Hans Seidel <>
Cc: Ingmar Poese <>,, IETF ALTO <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005dbb26059ba0ec66"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [alto] Chair review of draft-ietf-alto-incr-update-sse-17
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:32:30 -0000

Very well, please do file a request for agenda items once the email goes
out for Vancouver. Thanks.

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020, 7:06 AM Hans Seidel <> wrote:

> Hi Vijay,
> perfect. I am looking forward to present in Vancouver. Among
> implementation insights, we also happily share information about lessons
> learned and rolling out ALTO with partners.
> I will file an agenda request for the Vancouver session once asked for on
> the list.
> Thanks,
> Hans
> On 07.01.20 17:35, Vijay Gurbani wrote:
> Dear Hans: Thank you for your email.  At this point, I am interested in
> getting as much information about the implementation of the Internet-Draft
> as possible in preparation for moving the work ahead in the WG.  Certainly,
> I will be happy to allocate you some agenda time in Vancouver to document
> any lessons learned on implementing alto-sse.  If you are interested,
> please let me know.
> If anyone else on the list has any implementation of alto-sse, please let
> me know as well.
> Thanks,
> - vijay
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:26 AM Hans Seidel <> wrote:
>> Hi Vijay,
>> let me answer this question for Ingmar. Currently implemented is the JSON
>> merge patch feature. JSON patch is on our roadmap. We aim for a release
>> that is fully compatible with the latest draft prior to the Vancouver IETF
>> which I also plan to attend. Once the RFC is published, we are going to use
>> SSE in production with our partners.
>> If you or somebody on the list has an ALTO implementation and is
>> interested in running tests, feel free to contact us.
>> If you like to know more, feel free to ask. We also happily give further
>> insights in our SSE implementation, or our ALTO implementation in general
>> in Vancouver. If you or the list is interested in specific parts, please
>> let us know and we prepare some slides for Vancouver.