Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03.txt
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 08:10 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE6D1270AB for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:10:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ssrrjk0nlG0M for <alto@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F8E126D73 for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 886FBFB9CCBBB for <alto@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:10:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:10:03 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:09:58 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHTevvOyfVbjFOvKUmFNAH3SN8Mv6NPAbJg
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:09:58 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD26AC9@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/iBUt0LIer7bX5q0yvQqye1Rznf4>
Subject: Re: [alto] I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03.txt
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:10:08 -0000
The v-(03) is posted, this version addresses comments from Haizhou and Kai Gao. Thank for their helpful review. The diff is: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03 -Qin (on behalf of authors) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 internet-drafts@ietf.org 发送时间: 2017年12月22日 16:06 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org 抄送: alto@ietf.org 主题: I-D Action: draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization WG of the IETF. Title : ALTO Performance Cost Metrics Authors : Qin Wu Y. Richard Yang Young Lee Dhruv Dhody Sabine Randriamasy Filename : draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2017-12-22 Abstract: Cost Metric is a basic concept in Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO). It is used in both the Cost Map Service and the Endpoint Cost Service. Different applications may benefit from different Cost Metrics. For example, a Resource Consumer may prefer Resource Providers that offer a low delay delivery to the Resource Consumer. However the base ALTO protocol [ALTO] has documented only one single cost metric, i.e., the generic "routingcost" metric (Sec. 14.2 of ALTO base specification [ALTO]). This document, proposes a set of Cost Metrics, derived and aggregated from routing protocols with different granularity and scope, such as BGP-LS,OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE, or from end-to-end traffic management tools. It currently documents Network Performance Cost Metrics reporting on network delay, jitter, packet loss, hop count, and bandwidth. These metrics may be exposed by an ALTO Server to allow applications to determine "where" to connect based on network performance criteria. Additional Cost Metrics involving ISP specific considerations or other network technologies may be documented in further versions of this draft. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt