[alto] Alto Problem Statement
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Mon, 23 March 2009 03:38 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: alto@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0083A6B5A for <alto@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yejgSAKpEtna for <alto@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.252.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A563A6AEE for <alto@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.69.204] (port=50536 helo=dhcp-45cc.meeting.ietf.org) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1Llazz-0000ya-QV for alto@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:38:51 -0700
Message-Id: <BCDA15EA-1807-460F-A937-6EAC92E67E7A@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: alto@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-56--373179504"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:39:01 -0700
References: <49C6B9D6.8080605@telecomitalia.it>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: [alto] Alto Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/alto>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:38:13 -0000
I was preparing the slides for the IETF 74 ALTO meeting for the ProblemStatement, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-marocco-alto-problem-statement-05.txt (Full URL here for you to click on...) I believe that the current text incorporates all open issues raised on the list. To me, this means one of two things: (1) You have read the document, and you think it is great. That is wonderful! Please let us know. If you do not think it is great, PLEASE let us know by saying what we need to discuss on the list. (2) You have not read the document, so you do not have an opinion. That is OK if you do not plan on ever reading the document. It is not OK if there are issues and you are not bringing them to our attention for discussion. We have discussed what the problem statement is about, what it goals are, and its content over the past two IETFs. Thus if there are no open issues raised on the list, I would offer we still have a (short) agenda slot for last-minute readers to say their piece. Otherwise, we are done.
- [alto] Alto Problem Statement Eric Burger