Re: [alto] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-04: (with DISCUSS)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 19 December 2018 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: alto@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFAF130E0C; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:45:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrcbimZtKY10; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71949130E02; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [93.89.54.122] (helo=[192.168.1.85]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1gZe26-0008Hb-NB; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:45:14 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181219154139.bv3tfxnu7c3qd44p@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:45:08 +0100
Cc: draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc@ietf.org, alto@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, alto-chairs@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Jan Seedorf <jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74A4E907-4FF6-4BB8-BCD7-34C067ED341B@kuehlewind.net>
References: <154516546501.5516.6260976046434363502.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20181218232300.634bfvvny6jh3r3f@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de> <CAHw9_iL+n0d0CejmD==ciROOTpUkjjLPSdZuYjbVxAgim5dojw@mail.gmail.com> <92EDF993-76B5-45EF-BB30-FAE6A603ECA7@kuehlewind.net> <20181219154139.bv3tfxnu7c3qd44p@gw01.ehlo.wurstkaes.de>
To: Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1545234318;481798ec;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1gZe26-0008Hb-NB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/alto/y7ONGiKj2KRjH4lK5QNMIDzM678>
Subject: Re: [alto] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-alto-xdom-disc-04: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: alto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Application-Layer Traffic Optimization \(alto\) WG mailing list" <alto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/alto/>
List-Post: <mailto:alto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto>, <mailto:alto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:45:26 -0000

Thanks, I guess then we are fine!


> Am 19.12.2018 um 16:41 schrieb Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>;:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> The "don't do this on your laptop" is already in section 5.1.1:
> 
> [...] Therefore, using the procedures specified
> in this document for resource consumer based ALTO server discovery is
> generally NOT RECOMMENDED. 
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:14:45PM +0100, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>> Hi Warren, hi all,
>> 
>>> Am 19.12.2018 um 01:48 schrieb Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>;:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 6:23 PM Sebastian Kiesel <ietf-alto@skiesel.de>; wrote:
>>> Warren,
>>> 
>>> apologies if I restate something obvious, but the key issue for this
>>> discussion is probably that the XDOM procedure is NOT supposed to be run
>>> on your laptop, but instead on a centralized server such as a Content
>>> Delivery Networks's (CDN) HTTP redirect server, a P2P tracker, etc.,
>>> i.e., a "resource directory" in the terminology defined in RFC 5693.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ah, you might be restating something obvious, but I'd certainly missed the above bit / had gotten that part backwards... 
>> 
>> 
>> Is there anything that could/should be done to further clarify/make it more obvious in the draft? Like „Warning, don’t do this on your laptop“ ;-) … or more like some operational considerations?
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto