IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ANCP] Splitting multicast from protocol doc

Francois Le Faucheur IMAP <flefauch@cisco.com> Mon, 08 June 2009 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ancp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455DA3A68CD for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PoXSC3CFEEsp for <ancp@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A9E3A685E for <ancp@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.41,324,1241395200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="42272984"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Jun 2009 10:39:12 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n58AdCOH019264; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:39:12 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n58AdC2Q006529; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:39:12 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-332.cisco.com ([144.254.231.73]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:39:12 +0200
Received: from [217.167.117.21] ([10.61.102.188]) by xfe-ams-332.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:39:11 +0200
Message-Id: <671A5BF3-6386-4741-84C2-5B3051D77DAA@cisco.com>
From: Francois Le Faucheur IMAP <flefauch@cisco.com>
To: BOCCI Matthew <Matthew.Bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>, Dec Wojciech <wdec@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBB2919C-8729-4EF4-972A-049B2B56E352@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-4--137621930"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:39:10 +0200
References: <0458D2EE0C36744BABB36BE37805C29A039300AF@FRVELSMBS11.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <FBB2919C-8729-4EF4-972A-049B2B56E352@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2009 10:39:11.0690 (UTC) FILETIME=[5C4F3AA0:01C9E825]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3623; t=1244457552; x=1245321552; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=flefauch@cisco.com; z=From:=20Francois=20Le=20Faucheur=20IMAP=20<flefauch@cisco. com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[ANCP]=20Splitting=20multicast=20from=2 0protocol=20doc |Sender:=20; bh=V5dslDCb6ZOoI+yKOV1W+JAI0aFp1lo0xx1isD2P5/s=; b=oC8JKoIbd93FRp1mGfdH0qt0Dw3k3stgQSqX7ce3JpAQa4vrGaXV5CPt62 l5xiI3+o0xbto4C6bvc00P2cB2WJbAGJcGdiYp9unTWS8cB1/oX+dk6DWAZN h/6qDFtE7z;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=flefauch@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: ancp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ANCP] Splitting multicast from protocol doc
X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list <ancp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ancp>
List-Post: <mailto:ancp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp>, <mailto:ancp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:39:09 -0000

Matthew, Woj,

We had a few responses to this proposal. What is the final decision?

Thanks

Francois

On 31 Mar 2009, at 22:21, Francois Le Faucheur IMAP wrote:

> support.
> Francois
>
> On 31 Mar 2009, at 17:46, BOCCI Matthew wrote:
>
>> There was a proposal at the last IETF to take the multicast text  
>> from draft-ietf-ancp-protocol-05 and merge it with draft-lefaucheur- 
>> ancp-mc-extensions-01.
>>
>> We would thus have two protocol drafts:
>>
>> draft-ietf-ancp-protocol : Containing the solutions for the  
>> Topology discovery, line configuration and OAM use cases
>> Multicast extensions draft: Containing the transactional multicast  
>> solution and all of the content of draft-lefaucheur
>>
>> This would allow us to move forward with WG LC on the basic use  
>> case solutions, and also keep all of the multicast extensions in a  
>> single draft.
>>
>> Please can you indicate to the list whether you support this  
>> proposal.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ANCP mailing list
>> ANCP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email