Re: [Anima-signaling] Posting the draft tomorrow...

Hi Brian,

Sorry for late reply. We were having the Dragon Boat Festival holidays.

I looked through the change log, in general I think it's good. But I need more time to review the details. We can discuss the new version in the Anima mailing list.

Best regards,
Bing

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anima-signaling [mailto:anima-signaling-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 1:14 PM
> To: Anima signaling DT
> Subject: [Anima-signaling] Posting the draft tomorrow...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I will be on personal travel next week (Mon-Fri NZ time, roughly Sun-Thu in
> the Western hemisphere). So I want to post the latest GDNP draft before I
> leave.
> 
> Bing, as co-editor, are you OK with this version?
> 
> Latest plain text:
> https://github.com/becarpenter/animaproto/blob/master/draft-carpenter-a
> nima-gdn-protocol-04C.txt
> Latest readable html:
> https://github.com/becarpenter/animaproto/blob/master/draft-carpenter-a
> nima-gdn-protocol-04C.htm
> Latest diffs:
> https://github.com/becarpenter/animaproto/blob/master/Diff-draft-carpen
> ter-anima-gdn-protocol-04B-04C.htm
> 
> I  made changes following Jeferson's review and various other emails in the
> last few days. The biggest change is adding unsolicited synch (flooding,
> GDNP-style). I tuned the reference to DNCP as a result: like DNS-SD, it
> basically says "you can do that if you don't like the GDNP mechanism".
> 
> There are still plenty of rough edges, but we need to WG to read this before
> Prague.
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima-signaling mailing list
> Anima-signaling@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima-signaling