Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7576)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Wed, 08 November 2023 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1F8C15109F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FScHuTn0guxh for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA041C151076 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF9C424B42C; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2iwlgMcArv7S; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:b8ca:44d3:49fd:1cd1] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:b8ca:44d3:49fd:1cd1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43EC0424B42A; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230726163302.D0CC7E7283@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:55:19 -0800
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, pritikin@cisco.com, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, anima@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B487DD36-9810-4C40-8A67-4B7588513BF2@amsl.com>
References: <20230726163302.D0CC7E7283@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/08TGGp0pQ60lUA_9s18J0gzrEGg>
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7576)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 18:55:25 -0000

Hi Robert,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Jul 26, 2023, at 9:33 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
> "Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> 
> Section: 4.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   objective-value = text       ; name of the (list of) supported
>                                ; protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> objective-value = text       ; name of the supported protocols.
>                             ; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> This objective does not support a list of supported protocols. 
> The comment in the example might lead people to conclude they can do that.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
> Publication Date    : May 2021
> Author(s)           : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>