[Anima] [Errata Verified] RFC8995 (7576)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 09 November 2023 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403BCC18E552; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:55:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KPb_yeVCI8d2; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:55:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD457C18FCDD; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 69B47629685; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 08:55:04 -0800 (PST)
To: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, pritikin@cisco.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, anima@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231109165504.69B47629685@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:55:04 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/1421YFrD-bgU8Fm0D-A0eb_cJIo>
Subject: [Anima] [Errata Verified] RFC8995 (7576)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 16:55:15 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8995,
"Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7576

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Date Reported: 2023-07-26
Verified by: Rob Wilton (IESG)

Section: 4.3

Original Text
-------------
   objective-value = text       ; name of the (list of) supported
                                ; protocols: "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.


Corrected Text
--------------
   objective-value = text       ; name of the supported protocol,
                                ; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.


Notes
-----
This objective does not support a list of supported protocols. 
The comment in the example might lead people to conclude they can do that.

--------------------------------------
RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG