IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] WG status of draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 26 January 2024 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C07C1519B3; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:54:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9U8evQ7FHYR; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 070CFC14F68A; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:54:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE8D3898D; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:54:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id YbTJP7wcxEtB; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:54:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B863898C; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:54:19 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1706295259; bh=bgoKGChgykkm/3t9TtKQhWhaWTxrZZ93tCwJokccMWA=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UcXwGRCJ6KWy3jVMneVg5Dp+CWEObUWuWwi/8aQk/nZo+hQTlnUGdoFZK0X8Do8pr rea4CrTTlFzXapJImp3zgAC57KU0gPvpcCaNdxwnMdb4uZqIfCW4GSAxg23oDTebnT BuulbPNiGt5jJrqQnIDEZdJGx5pvSj2fAk0eytEHyYxtN7k7bU59D/uLTFefOEjSRZ eYvjwBkMq92u88dQ8MND9N3Mh7iK1YW23DZ5QuntseLtvngmDCn2Ntn1i6xqV/l3AK z1+2twaCHPeGnws/PW5TqxniL8K6Ra3ptO6eEesNR9wtviI1T7nRfxr+2fwCpf9Q7I 0bZswglRHJ4NA==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385A8292; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:54:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
cc: "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis.all@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <LV8PR11MB8536A21D94DDA2FB95F9F5D4B5792@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <LV8PR11MB8536A21D94DDA2FB95F9F5D4B5792@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:54:19 -0500
Message-ID: <13349.1706295259@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/16wbW5NI08duQk27vgOLDcoNVzo>
Subject: Re: [Anima] WG status of draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:54:35 -0000

Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
    > I wanted to check the WG status of this document.
    > draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-09 has been put on the publication
    > requested queue but seems to have a fairly strong dependency on
    > draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis, and hence I am wondering whether it
    > doesn’t make more sense to wait for draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis to also
    > be in the Pub Req queue before progressing them both together?

You are right.  As do all the other documents in WGLC!
There are some editorial reviews with many outstanding issues (24).
It's on me to finish this, and I seem to be developing the cycles to do that.

We did somewhat intentionally leave this document open in the event that WGLC on
other documents would reveal text that ought to have been in rfc8366bis.

So, you are completely correct that we have to get them all done.
We knew, a year ago, that it would become a cluster of dependancy cycles.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email