[Anima] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- On my first reading, I wondered why this was informational. It seems to seek
to standardize protocol elements. The explanation in the shepherd report
clarifies that; it would be helpful to include (a perhaps shortened version of)
that in the draft.

-2: RFC 8174 has boilerplate to address the "only in upper case" part. Please
consider using it rather than modifying the 2119 boilerplate.

-4.4: "It is therefore important to record all the prefix assignment history."
Isn’t this a local policy choice? Perhaps some operator believes in extreme log
minimization, does this mean to argue they are mistaken?