IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Anima drafts before IETF 91

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 05 October 2014 02:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4D71A039B for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vi9T0Cap5RfP for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C45D1A0397 for <anima@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1431520028; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 23:03:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F2DA063AED; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 22:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7363AEC; Sat, 4 Oct 2014 22:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <542F3E83.60107@gmail.com>
References: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF21C43FF2@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AF4E978@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF21C45772@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <542DD081.60507@gmail.com> <16559.1412296628@sandelman.ca> <542F3E83.60107@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:57:50 -0400
Message-ID: <19833.1412477870@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Dh2v7CViajrG6S1kAvqX4K07Nc8
Cc: anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] Anima drafts before IETF 91
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 02:57:54 -0000

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > We will be
    >> meeting as a BOF or a WG at the next IETF, so drafts > need to be
    >> posted by Oct. 27. Of course, anybody can post drafts.  > If they are
    >> in scope for the draft charter, they will be easier to > identify if
    >> named draft-AUTHOR-anima-TOPIC.
    >>
    >> > I'm expecting to see these at least:
    >>
    >> > -discovery-negotiation-protocol > -trust-bootstrap
    >>
    >> draft-richardson-6tisch-idevid-cert-00.txt is implementation area for
    >> -trust-bootstrap.
    >>
    >> draft-richardson-6tisch-security-6top-02.txt is an attempt to
    >> implement an architecture for trust-bootstrap.
    >>
    >> I'm not sure how they fit in to your agenda yet.

    > I suspect that even if we get the 2.5 hours we asked for, we won't be
    > able to do much more than identify alternative proposals for each goal,
    > and kick off an effort to compare/contrast those alternatives.

I agree; I don't need/want to present anything, just point out some ideas
that have developed.

I hope you will leave lots of agenda time for discussion.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email