IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] MichaelR/Rob/*: RFC8995 errata concerns

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 17 January 2024 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E51C14CE5D for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXK91gjUEGb1 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49A40C151065 for <anima@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6A51800D; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:45:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id M4kor6J0aeBo; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:45:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB121800C; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:45:24 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1705509924; bh=OyP44bolvAauGLBejKHpWn2ig5Dw0UDuSbM8vcKKMH0=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qa5UB9doHp53pPcSuAPBKphYcTJZQvZBKJXobJdsGH4N/G+m4x8VHN/55cvUm3/uI 7boSS/Gdoo8hQYi7fjoOWkrsoxS6Z2wmO8PejryTdIeGZ4ZB1dI6SrbhGWv/zN1z+H bnInxsyvHgmvN+Bx50Qf1JqsvQ5ppvCNzfJJTZtPLnii81kbK2fprWWRf5uk1iwBJ6 GjCSvWhbr3qCc7wkIApqIdL5R5dXsg0Lga7u0O/CzBXhGuXP+dH4QBbfvThiLeldml 0o8moZA5Fsd6xvsblBwZx1Q1BfIsY1yyPEP4doUZl430FFcdNXAuzzYY5d2GD0DbCE J4UcRdwjeQ6+Q==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D0D132; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:45:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <LV8PR11MB853636871E286AA42FDAE178B56C2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20210805211714.GC57091@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <9465.1628200645@localhost> <20210806003134.GA47840@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <7466.1628378147@localhost> <LV8PR11MB853636871E286AA42FDAE178B56C2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:45:24 -0500
Message-ID: <29353.1705509924@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/K44C8Mj3F2VVfjXJlO6zvMt_ys0>
Subject: Re: [Anima] MichaelR/Rob/*: RFC8995 errata concerns
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 16:45:30 -0000

Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
    > Was there any conclusion of what to do here, which I think applies to
    > errata 6648: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=6648

    > I don't think that this is an errata that can be verified, hence I'm
    > questioning whether "Held for document update" would be both correct
    > and helpful.  Would it be useful to update the text of the errata at
    > all, or alternatively, I could just point to this thread in the notes.

I wrote that errata based upon some discussion at some point about
implementing things, and probably my draft-richardson-anima-registrar-considerations.

**The SNI comment is really the Technical update part**

I'd like the XML to be patched, so whatever gets that done.



--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email