[Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8994 (7558)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 02 July 2023 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F378C14CF1F for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2023 14:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pEa1XuRHrJP for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jul 2023 14:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4878CC14CE2C for <anima@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jul 2023 14:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 14072E629D; Sun, 2 Jul 2023 14:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: tte+ietf@cs.fau.de, Michael.H.Behringer@gmail.com, sbjarnason@arbor.net, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, tte@cs.fau.de, shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: william.atwood@concordia.ca, anima@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230702215947.14072E629D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 14:59:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/Lc_2wZPblTzc345TUEvZ_LmuiU8>
Subject: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8994 (7558)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 21:59:51 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8994,
"An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7558

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: J. William Atwood <william.atwood@concordia.ca>

Section: 6.2.1

Original Text
-------------
   ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys of less
   than a 2048-bit modulus or curves with group order of less than 256
   bits.  They MUST support certificates with RSA public keys with
   2048-bit modulus and MAY support longer RSA keys.  They MUST support
   certificates with ECC public keys using NIST P-256 curves and SHOULD
   support P-384 and P-521 curves.

   ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys whose
   modulus is less than 2048 bits, or certificates whose ECC public keys
   are in groups whose order is less than 256 bits.  RSA signing
   certificates with 2048-bit public keys MUST be supported, and such
   certificates with longer public keys MAY be supported.  ECDSA
   certificates using the NIST P-256 curve MUST be supported, and such
   certificates using the P-384 and P-521 curves SHOULD be supported.

Corrected Text
--------------
   ACP nodes MUST NOT support certificates with RSA public keys whose
   modulus is less than 2048 bits, or certificates whose ECC public keys
   are in groups whose order is less than 256 bits.  RSA signing
   certificates with 2048-bit public keys MUST be supported, and such
   certificates with longer public keys MAY be supported.  ECDSA
   certificates using the NIST P-256 curve MUST be supported, and such
   certificates using the P-384 and P-521 curves SHOULD be supported.

Notes
-----
The second paragraph in the original text appears to be a more carefully-written version of the first paragraph.  Therefore the first paragraph should be deleted and the second paragraph retained.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8994 (draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-30)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : T. Eckert, Ed., M. Behringer, Ed., S. Bjarnason
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG