[Anima] ANIMA-WG: PLS check - moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm to AD on 08/23/2024 (was: Re: Result//RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023)

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 14 August 2024 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BD4C1E7254; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id phyirJAHeyiT; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0761CC1D6202; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 01:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WkLY14271znkp8; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 4WkLY13bn8zkx1F; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:10:45 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: mjethanandani@gmail.com, anima@ietf.org, anima-chairs <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm <draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm@ietf.org>, ietf@kovatsch.net
Message-ID: <ZrxmhY3p1xLMa0M9@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID-Hash: JNE45R5T7QFQGDNAIOAP3FVKGF7AFTDF
X-Message-ID-Hash: JNE45R5T7QFQGDNAIOAP3FVKGF7AFTDF
X-MailFrom: eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-anima.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Anima] ANIMA-WG: PLS check - moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm to AD on 08/23/2024 (was: Re: Result//RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023)
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/OYI_YggLPEGASGGTOEmzW28c5JM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:anima-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:anima-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anima-leave@ietf.org>

[resending, recipient list got messed up, sorry]

Dear ANIMA-WG

I am hereby want to do a lightweight last call to the WG before moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14 to our AD, Mahesh.

draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06 successfully finished WGLC in early 2023.
The editorial feedback from the WG lead to updates finished around draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-11.
Afterwards, Matthias Kovatsch did a very thorough shepherd review whose editorial
feedback was incorporated up to the curent version, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14.

I am positive that all those who did provide feedback during WGLC did check that
their feedback was correctly addressed, i know mine and Matthias (Shepherds) feedback
has been addressed. Likewise, testing with prototypes has successfully been done
since WGLC.

Neither WGLC feedback nor shepherd review did introduce any functional changes to the
protocol, but of course, the amount of restructuring and and editorial improvements to the text
is substantial, and this is why Mahesh asked us at IETF120 to check before taking over.

Therefore i would like to give the WG a last opportunity to raise issues.
If no substantial issues are raised, i will pass on the draft to our AD on 08/23/2024 (end of next week).

Thank you so much to everybody who helped to create this work!

Toerless - for the chairs.

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:20:05PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
> 
> I will provide an updated version by tomorrow, incorporating the proposed changes. 
> 
> Best regards
> Steffen
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@bupt.edu.cn>
> > Sent: Montag, 20. Februar 2023 04:42
> > To: anima <anima@ietf.org>; Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>; anima-chairs
> > <anima-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm <draft-ietf-anima-brski-
> > prm@ietf.org>; ietf <ietf@kovatsch.net>
> > Cc: ietf <ietf@kovatsch.net>
> > Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023
> > 
> > During the WGLC period, this drafts has received no objections, but comments.
> > Therefore, the chairs would draw on a passed conclusion . The WG discussed the
> > authors' suggestion that move the YANG components of this to rfc8366bis and
> > reach the consensus to respect the authors' choice. The authors please submit
> > an update version. Then, the document shepherd can move it forward.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > 
> > --------------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Sheng Jiang
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >Dear ANIMAers,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to
> > advance draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to BRSKI
> > (RFC8995) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only time
> > limited connectivity between a&nbsp;pledge and the domain registrar. This
> > document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no IPR filed
> > against this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document since
> > October, 2021 and has received a lot of feedback from the WG and work from
> > its authors. The authors therefore think is ready for WGLC. Please send your
> > comments by Feb. 15th 2023. If you do not feel this document should advance,
> > please state your reasons why.&nbsp;Matthias Kovatsch&nbsp;is the assgined
> > document shepherd.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >Regards,&nbsp;
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >Sheng
> >