Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 04 February 2020 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3C9120129; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:30:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=E+gt8rPB; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=W+UmaVhU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJqlnPFzsg06; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:30:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D46E120122; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 23:30:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2736; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1580801454; x=1582011054; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1E9ogAycY50R40zMGdGpjMx7jl53y9+ZV/R97jhmTvw=; b=E+gt8rPBcgY7am0H9Uwaps/Tx+loLrtBiT1w90T42gg3g1t2vRJZtJr0 bgVJxQOQD9ja4MRpRlPu8+zlLoF5dmN4L0DClECfsSScD3RSP+3cYcpp0 dVB4awsn3ZQrDjImIZLINDwiR6NlaEjMv6R51a09fFXfVgG8yRy57hgPY E=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AtVbIhhEHemG4+wdLMX9QLp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNV?= =?us-ascii?q?cejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efP0fioxH8lqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BcAQD7HDle/5xdJa1lDg4BAQEBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?BAREBBAQBAYFqBAEBCwGBUyQsBWxYIAQLKgqECoNGA4p5gjolmA+CUgNUCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQwBASMKAgEBhEACF4IdJDcGDgIDDQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhWcBAQECARI?= =?us-ascii?q?REQwBATcBDwIBCA4MAh8HAgICMBUQAgQBDQUigwQBgkoDDiABAwuhEwKBOYh?= =?us-ascii?q?idYEygn8BAQWFFhiCDAMGgQ4qAYwhGoFBP4ERJwwUgkw+gmQCgXyCeTKCLI1?= =?us-ascii?q?igjo7nxAKgjuHSY56G5sIjmGIZ5IzAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFoI4FYcBVlAYINATM?= =?us-ascii?q?fMRgNjh0MFxWDO4UUhQQ7dIEpjDABgQ8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,398,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="421407388"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Feb 2020 07:30:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0147UpKn015134 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:30:53 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:30:36 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 02:30:35 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 02:30:35 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=XImLVMPA5AxMwQOm5NEtz4Kxka/f54VvLp5x5IFFkIoc8yrXfbK1JlMn8zEyUuwgq8nJEJjKF809zgjb9mupmdzrh6JwZuTkT9xFp2dQ4XGCmFafjb3tpm2tc24NC98At8Te0tBT4Pvz57gtS0q/zbIG1qDfkUw1BhxlXQ0SIRcqOHFxhmPQ8dgc1MaGdVawfJbsKCFm8zjTKXQ2JvZldr0b5IG/UC0+BJgmLK///GdN463V5Q3SVWCt4Fdbqi9E3OejKEKDYrgsmkJwulEKPNlPLvee1fw+iuKP9hFnuGBnHKllRhGAlqiDMobsmdK9EfFrw3elkjPjjkZdf7+b2A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1E9ogAycY50R40zMGdGpjMx7jl53y9+ZV/R97jhmTvw=; b=hizqPw8ptqHdur4J/drPOZNdY6Bhx8hMkf0Q46EgVDaFzNwC+X0aV7hSv1EyqnRQN4JNi07PltVqUCYuZgUiuYGOAfBYEqy2p7+YBoa+ujH8/Y2J7+4nYIuophUWdI2U9M+CtgE2MEieIxrUCBiFohetQGapiF/NuMcTHElMLn/e8IXwQEd6B6oCnIc6Rla4cDN3lcdjmKQzXRMiLapLrxk8Wt/i2Pe/MQS2kjQ7w7JX2Vcgn0RIFHNEzmSDB9FUPyjVseRlRGAuUZMZMiWH/0r84v2HAXxD7yoJ2ASFhMmdhEU9Ar8pKfqBD21HQyaVoOwks/hd48xR/v2Yttx5Sw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=1E9ogAycY50R40zMGdGpjMx7jl53y9+ZV/R97jhmTvw=; b=W+UmaVhUJOLivWM9chitmDf5jICyZAaBJvDqHEW8Eq5gCm1OJbixozZLFMBivBVm46jwlcvOS+m9m4liRo632J345yj2bvynm6XUpR2eiHuO7EHKSGe/8Z6JgV8tgbzhJ16xOb9QWDWee38JOLonV9VUn4Nh/vKSv/k8hW+5A6M=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.88.141) by DM5PR11MB0043.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.164.154.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.33; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:30:34 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bcaa:91e6:c27b:b8ff]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::bcaa:91e6:c27b:b8ff%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2686.031; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:30:34 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
CC: "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "jiangsheng@huawei.com" <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHV2yz8y9tVyLCb2kKBeuBtDKasSg==
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 07:30:34 +0000
Message-ID: <3CF6794C-63E6-4078-A55F-329E874FEFC5@cisco.com>
References: <20191230173030.GJ35479@kduck.mit.edu> <20200204044933.GA22702@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200204044933.GA22702@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [92.184.116.201]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 160f7aed-1f2b-48d2-87a3-08d7a9441f4f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB0043:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB0043C2B91AED94962F901852A9030@DM5PR11MB0043.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 03030B9493
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(376002)(136003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(5660300002)(6506007)(966005)(4326008)(186003)(86362001)(316002)(33656002)(6512007)(64756008)(66476007)(478600001)(66556008)(66446008)(76116006)(81166006)(81156014)(71200400001)(66946007)(91956017)(36756003)(8936002)(54906003)(26005)(8676002)(2906002)(2616005)(6486002)(110136005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR11MB0043; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: JTbjAbALEmSYPVDk8s++9XywQl+JtzAYXZ9+PBqMiZhGliv7JYUzWBEeqLMP47KjOc+aurhnfLB2M3ujHzqwHd5op/2tB71ooeLaUCkniK9tJYPV4cTyQwTtzCBI5vpSgMGh9+9PAoTAXjJuEqO7JA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5AB8FDDC96D16E4CB4F64F34D92C2A3D@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 160f7aed-1f2b-48d2-87a3-08d7a9441f4f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Feb 2020 07:30:34.2001 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: EAw7wZu4cecUaKLRUGwz0EerikcTwFubPBboXi7WbnifYi0h8DCrgaP9IKPrFXAVdBbjz1a2RV07ieGkrZToPg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB0043
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/QaFnALUdKDR0OofmVKetGqtC0LU>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 07:30:57 -0000

Toerless

Thank you for this updated revision. 

About the next steps:

On 04/02/2020, 05:49, "iesg on behalf of Toerless Eckert" <iesg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

    Hi Benjamin

    -----%<------%<-----
   
    > That said, my one Discuss point is not the end of the road for things;
    > since as I understand it the WG has already considered the topic
    > extensively, it may be time to check with the responsible AD about bringing
    > the document back on a telechat with, e.g., an alternate ballot procedure
    > ("single-discuss" or the full-on "alternate procedure" from
    > https://ietf.org/standards/process/iesg-ballots/).  I don't remember
    > hearing much from any other IESG members on this topic, at least as of yet.
    
    Not quite sure i follow everything you say: My understanding is that
    E'ric is now the responsible AD for the document, so we authors will simply
    follow his guidance for any further necessary AD review .
    
    Given how we already had a lot of exhaustive and good reviews and resulting
    fixes, i hope the poor ADs will not be forced to repeat potentialy unnecessary
    work on such a big document given how the fixes are all well documented and
    also summarized now in the changelog (summarizing IESG review up to -21 and explaining
    that there are no fundamental changes just a good amount of detail fixes
    and textual improvements).  But this is my first RFC as big as this,
    so i have no prior good experience with the process in a case like this.

As I am the 'poor' responsible AD now, with the amount of changes in the document, an IETF-wide Last Call is required to ensure a swift process. As soon as I am confident that -22 is 'good to go', then I will start this Last Call, then IESG evaluation, ballot and telechat and hopefully the document will be approved before the new IESG.

Regards,

-éric

----%<-----------%<----------