IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] draft-vanderstok-anima-constrained-join-proxy-04: how can J know the content-format cf

Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl> Mon, 30 November 2020 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAABF3A0A94 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 05:22:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.116
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.116 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bbhmail.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3FkQ_Jli9w8 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 05:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0139.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBA23A0930 for <anima@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 05:22:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128B9182CED28; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:22:08 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbhmail.nl; h= mime-version:content-type:date:from:to:cc:subject:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:message-id; s=key; bh=wlQZooKtn5BCMA5sYx OYWcNifLE4kLZw9PrCbfaFHtg=; b=iUOLpACYJK3Gvn1g0wzAPJzc2MCdYgT8l1 sYgyQk2c3sYLxnUaORrvNzJdZq8GmIopCCHpqIknrpYsAQqnVRIvmJ0VeWYTLF49 SdNJQai+YrC3wIdqqwueU6KKb1SJWB94DpQ9NypRBdgZuNgiT/AIq6tPWYR8VmA0 CD302Wvlg=
X-Session-Marker: 73746F6B636F6E73406262686D61696C2E6E6C
X-Spam-Summary: 2, 0, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, stokcons@bbhmail.nl, , RULES_HIT:41:72:152:355:379:582:599:800:960:962:967:968:973:983:988:989:1152:1189:1208:1221:1260:1313:1314:1345:1359:1431:1436:1437:1516:1517:1518:1534:1541:1575:1588:1589:1592:1594:1711:1714:1730:1776:1792:2198:2199:2553:2559:2562:2827:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3865:3866:3867:3870:3871:3872:4250:4321:5007:6117:6119:6248:6261:6657:6659:6678:7903:8603:8784:9036:9177:10004:10215:10400:10848:11232:11657:11658:11783:11914:11984:12043:12114:12679:12740:12895:13095:13139:13255:14096:14181:14721:21080:21088:21433:21451:21525:21627:21939:30054:30090, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LFtime:1, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: scarf69_5e0acdc273a2
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3614
Received: from mail.bbhmail.nl (imap-ext [216.40.42.5]) (Authenticated sender: webmail@stokcons@bbhmail.nl) by omf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:22:07 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_d8c311cc40fecc8307e91c011ca90365"
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:22:07 +0100
From: Peter van der Stok <stokcons@bbhmail.nl>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, anima@ietf.org, peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <0005DBAB-E33E-4578-AAA3-06F906E7104A@tzi.org>
References: <AM8P190MB09794715877E8203687DD1EFFDF50@AM8P190MB0979.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <0005DBAB-E33E-4578-AAA3-06F906E7104A@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-rc2
Message-ID: <d4ad53b9a842fdbabf3a0ce201dbc993@bbhmail.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@bbhmail.nl
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
X-Originating-IP: [5.206.216.229]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/XH_OMEI4KDra1p-PFC-p6tR3oTQ>
Subject: Re: [Anima] draft-vanderstok-anima-constrained-join-proxy-04: how can J know the content-format cf
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:22:11 -0000

Yes, why not.

For the moment, in the invisible version 1, two content-formats are
transported:

1) application cbor describing the header of the JPY message
2) application cbor, a cbor byte string containing the DTLS

This clearly sits between two approaches.
1) replace with application/cbor for the whole
or 2) remove the cbor byte string from the DTLS payload

BTW, as these messages are not accompanied by a coap header , it is may
be better to completely forget about content formats.

Additional suggestions are really welcome.

Peter
Carsten Bormann schreef op 2020-11-30 14:12:

> On 2020-11-30, at 14:01, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote: 
> 
>> without using core-multipart
> 
> Why not?
> 
> Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email