IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] review of grasp-08

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 25 November 2016 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0511295E5 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OgaEeB9DoJX for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25C031294A8 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id x23so32209976pgx.1 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2JFZ0K0JPTs4Zyu6YkoSM/MDqyOiRpTsu6Baj9//RcA=; b=YCYcClnbN5PQoezlvSTIumgzPiK4EIzTTlZjTbWYeJMGAMT/bdn0Q1X24bRREsMry2 MSZvMvN0ldpfPDIbfLfQCTm+/nn7C0+swWZAyYVlys2GFR0pNr0wnfdZIcJ+Rmg1vNU0 dmuaBgO7/OCHkWOI4MP1BqWiGhBZfOK3fCWW7EPUdD/Me+LU6kk8YaoKZHE0NnoThqYp i+tcNtXfdH3dLnxoO5pIboRKQ8ZO1aiu25cicq/qLxb9EIc9KVglmkvaokW4WQD+vlxW FFpYWZRlm8YeClr+ovcdG/QzSP2sJkFj6fgRGYI2JUsdxq43lJDuA1Pk+V6S37ajvUFN CfEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2JFZ0K0JPTs4Zyu6YkoSM/MDqyOiRpTsu6Baj9//RcA=; b=D0fOF+IkatrXd44o9meBqXyxbYp8Ye3zWBE8HWEG4iw2x+pBVletzg68HCCvyNiAdi wyh6hGC9M3dkCvuPb14QCZmXAuFQ30/Xxa34xvUXdPxblXb9GIe7J70vh61E7BQLOHpo ZAlIaLXRbYdy5A6nLdEPNw3u9uitb2r1/rUb0f/leEk/gssuubWl5r+xm0pZQ+ZZT61i Dr3F0lDhRz2TcgQfQXhT1V/tq4jgkWKiOn8pIJrwSgTaqYNsAEU48y449BVGw/8zOwBV x9il+fYcLunepczQAkzK6J1O6Pyrle7p6qfK13VwTyw7PThCtsvWueskigF+TVBWCQQZ k2SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC012tn6DQ7GDgYRqR6OfrEy/8w4unl/2+BHlQSxLwNydZ9M1pqtrkwvCYM1cgZ97WQ==
X-Received: by 10.84.142.70 with SMTP id 64mr19231469plw.177.1480101126379; Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:7832:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:7832:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k25sm14997948pfg.84.2016.11.25.11.12.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:12:05 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <4565.1479941260@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <dee9e527-4e32-5abf-9b17-e6d96cc34f97@gmail.com> <10713.1480019847@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <dcd5711b-904d-fc6d-1f1d-5beba8d8816c@gmail.com> <3899.1480051805@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <c434c0d8-9cde-709e-7a56-a4be4aea954b@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 08:12:14 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3899.1480051805@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/YkJmrEYeKk-UnMHEQ889h3KDaXI>
Cc: anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] review of grasp-08
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 19:12:08 -0000

On 25/11/2016 18:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > Right. But to be very clear, at the moment the M_FLOOD syntax is
> 
>     >  flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl, (locator-option
>     > / []), +objective]
> 
>     > but to associate a locator with each objective it would need to be
> 
>     >  flood-message = [M_FLOOD, session-id, initiator, ttl,
>     > +[(locator-option / []), objective]]
> 
>     > That would be more powerful for the case you describe. Since the
>     > locator option could be a URI, it would suit EST quite well, wouldn't
>     > it?
> 
> yes-ish, but really, the proxy is in charge of where the Registrar is.
> In a pure-ANIMA scenario, we don't use an EST URI.
> 

Ack. In any case, do you think we should make this change? It's now or never.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email