Re: [Anima] Adoption call for draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines-09, ends October 29th 2020

Toerless Eckert <> Fri, 06 November 2020 04:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F253A0C73; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:45:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D9lSwCBOlFnT; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC103A0C82; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 20:45:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE39354843F; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:45:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 10463) id C6636440059; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:45:19 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:45:19 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <>
To: Anima WG <>
Cc: "" <>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Adoption call for draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines-09, ends October 29th 2020
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:45:28 -0000

The adoption call did produce no concerns but only support for adoption,
and the draft had a lot of good input through its individual-author lifetime
from the WG (especially through several in person meetings (*) ) and is technically (IMHO)
in good shape (about three sections self-explain gaps i am confident will be closed by the authors).

So... we should adopt this draft.

Authors: please submit a version as draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-00, i will approve it.
I guess this will have to wait until the 14th due to the blackout period.

I will also be happy to be document shepherd. To that extend i will
send an initial shepher review of -09 out immediately. Feel free to incorporate
 feedback to that review into -00 or a later version.

    Toerless (ANIMA WG chair hat on)

(*) sob...

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:36:47PM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> This message starts a two-week adoption call, ending on October 29th, 2020.
> draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines-09 has been progressed by the authors with help of the WG for a long while and the WG showed good interest. It was last presented at IETF108 and had no opposition. The draft is now clearly in scope of ANIMA charter 2 that was adopted around IETF106. The authors asked for adoption of the document at IETF108.
> We therefore are asking the ANIMA working group for adoption of the following work:
> Title:    Guidelines for Autonomic Service Agents
> Name:     draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines-09
> Authors:  B. E. Carpenter, L. Ciavaglia, S. Jiang, P. Peloso
> URL:
> This document is intended to become an informational ANIMA WG document.
> Please express your support or rejection.
> If you think this document should _not_ be adopted, please also explicitly indicate the reasons.
> Regards,
> Toerless