IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] Input/Questions for ANIMA @ IETF 111, online

Dangjuanna <dangjuanna@huawei.com> Tue, 08 June 2021 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dangjuanna@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301F53A2391; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 23:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qpc8HzPk98rT; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 23:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3963A2394; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 23:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FzfdP6Jy8z6G7vQ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:56:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) by fraeml701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 08:09:39 +0200
Received: from nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) by nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:09:38 +0800
Received: from nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.160]) by nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.160]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:09:38 +0800
From: Dangjuanna <dangjuanna@huawei.com>
To: "tte@cs.fau.de" <tte@cs.fau.de>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "anima-chairs@ietf.org" <anima-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Anima] Input/Questions for ANIMA @ IETF 111, online
Thread-Index: AQHXWVBTcXrxPqR08EGs2GIEtZHHyKsJo6iw
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 06:09:37 +0000
Message-ID: <85fefa93a503461c82b115e9191de8a1@huawei.com>
References: <20210604144523.GB58067@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20210604144523.GB58067@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.235.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/jaedgMaTWIhLAhydUEw9fJ7jL3w>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Input/Questions for ANIMA @ IETF 111, online
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 06:09:56 -0000

Hi Toerless,

I am going to submit a draft on resource-based(such as bandwidth, latency and jitter) service self-deployment. The adaptive mechanisms between service systems and network element are required to ensure maximum utilization of network resources and improve service deployment efficiency. GRASP can be considered as a signaling protocol for two components.
I would like to take 10 minutes to introduce and discuss it.

Best wishes,
Joanna

-----Original Message-----
From: Anima [mailto:anima-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tte@cs.fau.de
Sent: 2021年6月4日 22:45
To: anima@ietf.org; anima-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [Anima] Input/Questions for ANIMA @ IETF 111, online

Hi folks,

Deadline for submission of WG meeting requests for IETF 111 is June 11th.

In the last few IETFs, we only collected our agenda items last minute, and the 1 hour sessions where then pretty tightly packed, allowing for little discussion. However, we do have ongoing good discussion in the weekly brski related design team meetings, and other side activities. 

Yada yada: I will wait for the deadline and want to ask via this mail for feedback if people feel we should request a longer (or two) slots @IETF111, especially when contributors think they want to discuss longer about potential new work. 

Short of any feeedback for such longer slot suggestions, i will go forward and ask again for a 1 hour slot before the deadline and then we can do our usual last-minute *sigh* agenda building against that - as usual *sigh*.

Lets also remember that side-meetings are easy to set up and do (NEW!) also support meetecho. Aka: are for all intent and purpose tools-wise as good as a full online IETF (i think).

Cheers
    Toerless

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email