IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Anima] changes for CORE-SID and SX:structure in draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-04 and -05

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 03 February 2023 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30B5C169537 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 06:43:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kh2zO0Zw0gpp for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 06:43:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6B6C14F724 for <anima@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 06:43:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [109.190.253.13]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8B61F4BD; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:38:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5FA5BA1E6E; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 08:11:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7B5A1E6A; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 14:11:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com>
cc: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <DU0PR10MB5196D3ED93223729C837FAB0F3CE9@DU0PR10MB5196.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <167345911024.15670.5822349028239537605@ietfa.amsl.com> <18071.1673461082@localhost> <1614.1673547905@localhost> <14544.1674572289@localhost> <DU0PR10MB5196D3ED93223729C837FAB0F3CE9@DU0PR10MB5196.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Comments: In-reply-to "Fries, Steffen" <steffen.fries@siemens.com> message dated "Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:23:29 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 14:11:43 +0100
Message-ID: <2030072.1675429903@dyas>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/oDL_ebnid0J5bSQ5-PiNbntLm8g>
Subject: Re: [Anima] changes for CORE-SID and SX:structure in draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-04 and -05
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 14:43:39 -0000

Fries, Steffen <steffen.fries@siemens.com> wrote:
    > looks fine from a BRSKI-PRM perspective. The parameters defined are
    > contained. While BRSKI-PRM does not specify further values, I was
    > thinking if equivalent values for the constraint case for -
    > agent-provided-proximity-registrar-cert: for constraint also
    > agent-provided-proximity-registrar-pubk and
    > agent-provided-proximity-registrar-pubk-sha256 - agent-sign-cert: for

Esko, should we?


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email